Devil505 wrote:[...Gun owners in this country are a very powerful......"Single Issue" block of voters & no one's guns or ammo WILL EVER be confiscated or your 2nd amendment rights ever be revoked.
If however, you believe that NO regulation of firearms is the proper way for any civilized group of people to avoid making rules to live together, then you need to buy an island in the South Pacific, announce your sovereignty to the world & make your own rules...
What a convenient argument for your side, Devil: Regulate the arms into uselessness.
Sounds good on the surface but the effect is the exactly same as the revocation of the second amendment.
Fact is: a true repeal of the second amendment under constitutional amendment procedure would fail miserably because the people wouldn't allow it.
The whole point of the fear expressed in the news is that there is fear
, based on past regulatory acts of left wing moonbats in power. Because the moonbats cannot win a full frontal assault on the second amendment, that they will use the end around or "termite" approach in order to strip the populace of their ultimate check and balance. It is an undemocratic and evil plan to render the population defenseless against a powerful government in which they have a vested interest.
As for your battlefield justice, it spits in the face of the law. It's disgraceful. We have both the "rule of law" as established by the constitution and the second amendment as a check and balance to your kind of thinking.
My sense of rage makes me want to see the idiot gunman dead too, but I'd rather have him roughed up a bit by the officers involved and alive for trial. A fair trial proves that the system works. Your method is mobacracy. It is the antithesis of our constitutional foundation.