Cheney for Prez!

SMITTY wrote:
& I thought you said it was F R O N T P A G E ???? Unless I'm blind, I didn't see any reference to the flyover on that front page! I'm NOT surprised......

The link I posted is to dynamic content which changes daily.

I think you're gonna have to explain "dynamic", tvb....

stockingfull wrote:I think you're gonna have to explain "dynamic", tvb....

Boom goes the dynamite.

Thanks for your help stock -- I can always count on a super smart lawyer boy to help me to understand life!

stockingfull wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/opinion/28douthat.html

What we really need for President is another Dick.

Judging from the retrospective gymnastics the Times writer went through to draw his conclusions, I'd have to say that for such lefty diatribes to be popular 100 days after your messiah was installed, it can only mean that...

All you dems have a massive case of Dick envy!

and why not...he was big, upstanding and highly potent !

mikeandgerry wrote:

stockingfull wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/opinion/28douthat.html

What we really need for President is another Dick.

Judging from the retrospective gymnastics the Times writer went through to draw his conclusions, I'd have to say that for such lefty diatribes to be popular 100 days after your messiah was installed, it can only mean that...

All you dems have a massive case of Dick envy!

and why not...he was big, upstanding and highly potent !

[before the beta-blockers... ]

He was a scum sucking draft dodger.

samhill wrote:He was a scum sucking draft dodger.

Given his aim with a weapon it's probably just as well.