Coalcast Ep5: "Anthracite Mining Regulations" - June 4, 2009
- Richard S.
- Mayor
- Posts: 15183
- Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
- Location: NEPA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
- Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
The topic for our fifth live broadcast will be "Anthracite Mining Regulations".
Patrick and Paul will be discussing new regulations and other issues effecting the slowly disappearing underground mines in the area how they may effect you the anthracite consumer. I'm also pleased to announce we will have our first guest on the show and possibly others, our very own Mike who is member here will be on the show to share his insight. Mike works as an underground miner so he will have first hand knowledge.
List of Archived Shows
Patrick and Paul will be discussing new regulations and other issues effecting the slowly disappearing underground mines in the area how they may effect you the anthracite consumer. I'm also pleased to announce we will have our first guest on the show and possibly others, our very own Mike who is member here will be on the show to share his insight. Mike works as an underground miner so he will have first hand knowledge.
List of Archived Shows
Attachments
- VigIIPeaBurner
- Member
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Fri. Jan. 11, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: Pequest River Valley, Warren Co NJ
- Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Keystoker Koker(down)
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Vermont Casting Vigilant II 2310
- Other Heating: #2 Oil Furnace
Good one! Thank you-s to Paul and especially Mike "A".
- Richard S.
- Mayor
- Posts: 15183
- Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
- Location: NEPA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
- Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite
I'll have to agree, that was most interesting. Mike did a great job but he cheated because he has practice with speaking publicly. As mentioned in the show not only does he work actively in mine he also active doing tours at the No. 9 mine in Lansford, PA. So head out and meet him in person.
As suggested if you want you can contact your representative and let them know you support the Underground Miners and let them know the special challenges they face with these regulations.
You may also contact Tim Holden the representative for the district these small underground mines exist in.
We'll be posting the audio shortly in this thread if you missed it. We'll be continuing this conversation with Mike and some other guests next month on June 2 with hopefully an update on today's topiuc but we'll focusing more on the interest side of the story and delve a little deeper into the life of an underground miner past and present. Should be just as interesting if not more.
Thanks again to both Paul and Mike.
As suggested if you want you can contact your representative and let them know you support the Underground Miners and let them know the special challenges they face with these regulations.
You may also contact Tim Holden the representative for the district these small underground mines exist in.
We'll be posting the audio shortly in this thread if you missed it. We'll be continuing this conversation with Mike and some other guests next month on June 2 with hopefully an update on today's topiuc but we'll focusing more on the interest side of the story and delve a little deeper into the life of an underground miner past and present. Should be just as interesting if not more.
Thanks again to both Paul and Mike.
- pvolcko
- Verified Business Rep.
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Mon. Jan. 16, 2006 4:26 pm
- Location: Syracuse, NY
- Contact:
Thanks for listening everyone and thanks to Mike for being the first guest on the show!
We'll get it posted sometime tomorrow. Lots of good info in there.
For more info on the topic check out:
June 15th - a Date to Watch?
http://www.msha.gov/REGS/FEDREG/NOTICES/2008Misc/ ... -29943.asp
http://www.msha.gov/regs/complian/guides/Commoand ... acking.pdf
In case anyone is wondering, something called a Leaky Feeder was mentioned during the show. Information on it can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaky_feeder]Leaky Feeder.
There are a number of other technologies used for tunnel based wireless communication and tracking, too. RFID tag based systems, pager systems, medium wave systems, even WiFi is used in some cases.
And links to Mike's related sites:
http://no9mine.com/
We'll get it posted sometime tomorrow. Lots of good info in there.
For more info on the topic check out:
June 15th - a Date to Watch?
http://www.msha.gov/REGS/FEDREG/NOTICES/2008Misc/ ... -29943.asp
http://www.msha.gov/regs/complian/guides/Commoand ... acking.pdf
In case anyone is wondering, something called a Leaky Feeder was mentioned during the show. Information on it can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaky_feeder]Leaky Feeder.
There are a number of other technologies used for tunnel based wireless communication and tracking, too. RFID tag based systems, pager systems, medium wave systems, even WiFi is used in some cases.
And links to Mike's related sites:
http://no9mine.com/
Mike mentioned that 50-60-70 "Nodes" or "antennas" would have to be setup "line-of-sight" in a Anthrasite mine, because of so many bends, twists, and curves in the vein. My concern is if a incident such as a cave-in happened, wouldn't those nodes loose "Line-of-sight" ? In my mind, wouldn't a wired system connecting all the nodes, be a better alternative? Just put the wires in sched80 iron pipe and bury it a couple inches. That'll make sure communications is never lost during fire or cave-in?
But that does not address the wireless devices the miners will have to wear on their belts. Mikes suggestion was good that the active working face is only 200ft anyway, so anyone up top will know where the miners are. Hence, no need for the devices to begin with.
Interesting topic!
But that does not address the wireless devices the miners will have to wear on their belts. Mikes suggestion was good that the active working face is only 200ft anyway, so anyone up top will know where the miners are. Hence, no need for the devices to begin with.
Interesting topic!
- pvolcko
- Verified Business Rep.
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Mon. Jan. 16, 2006 4:26 pm
- Location: Syracuse, NY
- Contact:
I think part of the rules is that there are two paths of communication, either two entry points need to be covered by a single system or two systems going into a single entry point. The two entry point scheme makes sense and would have a decent chance of preserving comms in the event of a cave in. The two systems in a single entry point, though, seems far less likely to be useful. In such a case a buried wire, perhaps with "hardened" wireless antenna nodes along it to give the wireless feature needed, would be far more likely to survive. Or perhaps a hybrid system where a wireless antenna or two are attached to a wired system in the active section of the mine. Should be far less expensive andprovide all the tracking and comms features required by the new mandate.
Of course, this is all a bit beside the main point. According to Mike any RF system is going go against manufacturer warnings on blasting trigger equipment. If they can not at least get an exemption to turn off the wireless system while setting up and conducting a blast then that would appear to be a large risk. I suspect having a RF system online against the explosive manufacturers recommendations would invalidate any insurance coverage if an event occurred. If they can't get an exemption or if the explosive manufacturers will not certify their equipment to work along side the RF range these comm/tracking systems work in, then it seems that would be the end of underground anthracite mining.
Of course, this is all a bit beside the main point. According to Mike any RF system is going go against manufacturer warnings on blasting trigger equipment. If they can not at least get an exemption to turn off the wireless system while setting up and conducting a blast then that would appear to be a large risk. I suspect having a RF system online against the explosive manufacturers recommendations would invalidate any insurance coverage if an event occurred. If they can't get an exemption or if the explosive manufacturers will not certify their equipment to work along side the RF range these comm/tracking systems work in, then it seems that would be the end of underground anthracite mining.
From what Mike was saying about MSHA's quote, (sorry, this is from memory) '"We do not plan on putting any mine out of bussiness", leads me to believe the regulations may be put in place, but maybe they don't plan on enforcing it?pvolcko wrote: then it seems that would be the end of underground anthracite mining.
- coal berner
- Member
- Posts: 3600
- Joined: Tue. Jan. 09, 2007 12:44 am
- Location: Pottsville PA. Schuylkill County PA. The Hart Of Anthracite Coal Country.
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1986 Electric Furnace Man 520 DF
Mike here are the coal tonnage Production Numbers for the Underground mines for 2008 from the highest to the lowestmike wrote:It's more like they don't intend on putting a mine out of buisness by enforcing a regulation but if it does happen so be it.
mine . Toltal # of Underground Mines Are 12 with 110 miners 2008.
Two of them Mines in 2009 are not Running / Closed
Toltal of coal tons for all of the 12 mines 2008 was 235.899 Tons of Coal . 12 mines
2007 was 209.608 Tons with 13 mines.
2006 Toltal Tons where 270.773 with 14 mines
2005 Toltal Tons 189.899 with 17 mines
2004 Toltal Tons 271.029 with 20 mines
2003 Toltal Tons 308.464 with 27 mines
2002 Toltal Tons 203.253 with 26 mines
2001 Total Tons 154.111 with 13 mines
2000 Total Tons 220.462 with 23 mines
1999 Toltal Tons 311.512 with 22 mines
1998 Toltal Tons 412.394 with 38 mines
UAE CoalCorp Assoc. Harmony mine 141.161Tons with 47 Employees with 102.186 Hours Worked - Columbia County Pa.
2008
Kimmel's Mining INC. Williamstown # 1 Mine 29.002 Tons with 16 Employees 26.641 Hours Worked- Schuylkill County PA.
2008
RS & W Coal Co. Wood Drift Mine 17.849 Tons with 6 Employees 9.438 Hours Worked Schuylkill County PA.
2008
Orchard Coal Co INC. Orchard Coal Mine 14.076 Tons with 9 Employees 17.053 Hours Worked- Schuylkill County PA.
2008
B & B Anthracite Coal Co. Rock Ridge Mine 13.901 Tons with 8 Employees 14.560 Hours Worked- Schuylkill County PA.
2008
Bear Gap Coal Co. N & L Slope Mine 5.918 Tons with 4 Employees 6.720 Hours Worked- Northumberland County PA.
2008
S & M Coal Co. Buck Mountain Mine 4.667 Tons with 4 Employees 6.328 Hours Worked- Dauphin County PA.
2008
Alfred Brown Coal Brown 7 Ft Mine 4.148 Tons with 4 Employees 4.410 Hours Worked- Schuylkill County PA.
2008
K & C Coal Co K & C Mine 3.309 Tons with 3 Employees 4.820 Hours Worked- Schuylkill County PA .
2008
FKZ Coal INC. No 1 Mine 1.350 Tons with 5 Employees 7.390 Hours Worked- Northumberland County PA.
2008
Little Buck Coal Co. Little Buck Mine 406 Tons with 2 Employees 780 Hours Worked- Schuylkill County PA.
2008
Joliett Coal Co. Joliett Coal 3 Mine 112 Tons with 2 Employees 1.106 Hours Worked- Schuylkill County PA.
2008
- pvolcko
- Verified Business Rep.
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Mon. Jan. 16, 2006 4:26 pm
- Location: Syracuse, NY
- Contact:
JC, where did you get those numbers? I don't doubt them, just wondering what the source is. I brought up some 2007 numbers from the EIA. 15 mines, 190+ employees, 224KTons total PA production from underground anthracite mines. Bit different than what you provided, but not too far off. Not sure what the mine count would be different, but EIA listed employees whereas you're providing miners so that explains that discrepency.
http://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/
2007 figures, published sept 2008. Latest report from that agency. The have quarterly reports too, but not the detailed breakdown of surface vs underground mines and they don't include employment figures.
http://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/
2007 figures, published sept 2008. Latest report from that agency. The have quarterly reports too, but not the detailed breakdown of surface vs underground mines and they don't include employment figures.