jpete wrote:Who are you? The chief Middle East legal expert? You know who is and isn't guilty halfway around the world? The people who Saddam killed were guilty of crimes against Saddam. Period. End of story. His country, his rules. Same argument you are making to me about the Saudi's.
your so misled, what Saddam did to his people is totally different then what is happening in saduia arabia. Its not even close to the same. You trying to compare the two situation is ludicrous.
jpete wrote:And I got nothing to do with BHO. Try to have a clue who you are talking to before you try to insult me. I helped get Ron Paul on the ballot here, I donated money to his campaign, and I ran as a delegate for him to the national convention. And when he dropped out, I voted for Chuck Baldwin.
So you knowingly tried to get ron paul who had no chance in hell of ever winning an elction on the ballot, then once that failed, you thought ill try to hurt the republicans chances even more and vote for freaking chuck baldwin. My friend, what you did was vote for obama believe it or not. I guess if you want you can go ahead and keep wasting your time on some thrid party candidate who has no shot in hell of ever getting elected not in my lifetime or your kids lifetime.
jpete wrote:R's and D's are two sides to the same coin. Tax and spend vs. borrow and spend. All a bunch of turds that WILL destroy this country.
Once again your wrong, There is a huge difference between R's and D's you must be blind not to see the difference. I guess you see no difference between Sarah Palin whos state is amoung the best financially in the country and someone like Obama who spends our money like its going out of style. Not to mention the whole abortion thing, i guess there is no difference there either. There is a big difference between r's and d's especially when you go to the left of the d and the right of the r. the differences would over flow the grand canyon.
And sheeple such as yourself who swallow the party line will help them until the end.
I dont vote by party line. I vote for people who most represent my political, financial, and spiritual views. The truly sad thing is that without even knowing it, when you cast your ballot for chuck baldwin you really cast a vote for socialism.
Calling me a "sheeple" because i vote for people who mostly think like id do and share my political views and views on life is just wrong.
Wikipedia describes a "sheeple" as
Sheeple is a term of disparagement, a portmanteau created by combining the words "sheep" and "people."
It is often used to denote persons who voluntarily acquiesce to a perceived authority, or suggestion without sufficient research to understand fully the scope of the ramifications involved in that decision, and thus undermine their own human individuality or in other cases give up certain rights. The implication of sheeple is that as a collective, people believe whatever they are told, especially if told so by a perceived authority figure believed to be trustworthy, without processing it or doing adequate research to be sure that it is an accurate representation of the real world around them.
That to me sounds like all of the morons who out right voted for obama and those who voted for chuck baldwin (really casting a vote for obama and socialsim)
I think for myself, do my own independent research on the issues and watch and listen to alternate forms of media besides the state run media the white house shoves down our throat. I would be the exact opposite of a "sheeple" i am the anti sheeple.