Magnehelic Question

 
jrn8265
Member
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue. Jul. 22, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Near Coal Country, PA

Post by jrn8265 » Mon. Aug. 24, 2009 8:12 am

I only switched because of the cheap find on Ebay and the magnehelic allows me to set it and forget it so my wife can see the draft without worrying about her needing to reset and remove hoses each time.

 
User avatar
Yanche
Member
Posts: 3026
Joined: Fri. Dec. 23, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Sykesville, Maryland
Stoker Coal Boiler: Alternate Heating Systems S-130
Coal Size/Type: Anthracite Pea

Post by Yanche » Mon. Aug. 24, 2009 10:13 am

jrn8265 wrote:I had a dwyer II manometer that was .03% accurate to scale. The Magnehelic says .02% accurate to scale.
True, but a Magnehelic is much more expensive. I qualified my opinion with "the same dollar spent". Also at the draft values we are normally measuring the 2% accuracy degrades to 3 or 4% depending on Magnehelic model. You should also realize the accuracy is + or - of the full scale value not the actual reading value. That's why it's important to match the instruments full scale range to the value you are trying to measure.


 
jrn8265
Member
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue. Jul. 22, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Near Coal Country, PA

Post by jrn8265 » Mon. Aug. 24, 2009 12:39 pm

Yanche, yep!

I have the 0 to .25 Dwyer which should be at 2% and stay there for the whole range.

This will work better for my application.

Could not pass up $25 as my manometer cost me $45.

Post Reply

Return to “Stoker Coal Furnaces & Stoves Using Anthracite (Hot Air)”