Richard S. wrote:Read Me before Posting Here
Welcome to the "Thoughtful and Intelligent Debates".
If you're going to post in this forum have an argument, this forum will be moderated for content much more than the standard forums. Flaming, abuse or any other nonsense no matter how minor will not be tolerated under any circumstances. This is not to say any opinions will be censored, it's to say you better have a opinion and reason for your opinion. Keep your posts and discussions at a higher level and be sure they have significant discussion value.
Those not following along with these rules will have there posting privileges in this forum revoked.
Paulie wrote:
It is a hoot that questioning the appropriateness of a subject is edited, yet not the subject that is questionable.
cokehead wrote:Judging by the responses it is obvious I am a minority in my position. I appoligize to those who feel that this is an inappropiate topic for a coal forum.
coaledsweat wrote:cokehead wrote:Judging by the responses it is obvious I am a minority in my position. I appoligize to those who feel that this is an inappropiate topic for a coal forum.
This particular forum is named "Thoughtful and Intelligent Debates". While many may disagree with what is posted here, it is posted in the appropriate forum.
cokehead wrote:If you believe it is the point of viability outside the womb then the laws based on that persumtion make sense. I don't think I'm wise enough, I don't think anyone is wise enough to know the answer to just when an unborn child is worth protecting such as it can be done by a law. My heart says protect them all but I am one voice. One voice does not change laws. Maybe, just maybe I can change the heart of another person.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group