Yanche wrote:With full rated 130,000 BTU continuous load it would fill your empty ash pan in less than 24 hours. Estimate how much coal you burn to fill the ash pan and you will be in the ball park. However it's not a likely operating condition. It would cause global warming too.
brckwlt wrote:Yanche wrote:With full rated 130,000 BTU continuous load it would fill your empty ash pan in less than 24 hours. Estimate how much coal you burn to fill the ash pan and you will be in the ball park. However it's not a likely operating condition. It would cause global warming too.
Im not concerned with the ash pan being filled in a 24 hour period. i was just wondering what the aa-130 is capable of burning in one 24 hour period with out shutting off.
Yanche wrote:brckwlt wrote:Yanche wrote:With full rated 130,000 BTU continuous load it would fill your empty ash pan in less than 24 hours. Estimate how much coal you burn to fill the ash pan and you will be in the ball park. However it's not a likely operating condition. It would cause global warming too.
Im not concerned with the ash pan being filled in a 24 hour period. i was just wondering what the aa-130 is capable of burning in one 24 hour period with out shutting off.
That wasn't the point. You know how long it takes you to fill your ash bucket and the coal that was consumed to fill it. I'm saying if the A-A burned at full capacity you would likely fill that ash bucket in less than 24 hours. So your coal consumption for an entire 24 hr. period would be at least the amount of coal it takes you to fill it now. Got it?
coalnewbie wrote:This thread is fascinating. Lots to learn at coal college. I have a Keystoker too and two Poconos - big Victorian farmhouse - big problems. The Keystoker is in the middle of a big room with 11' ceilings and chimney right up the middle. Incredible heat output but yes it does not burn as much coal as it should according to these calcs. About 50-70# a day when its cold. Now my Poconos (110K) chew through the coal in fact poco1 (as I call it) b4 I put in a second one, used up to 175# day. I opted for that config rather that a hyfire II for redundancy and heat output and this raises another question. Using two stoves I have a much bigger firebox area and so the question of efficiency of these stoves as they are pushed to the limit arises. Are they more efficient when they are middling along not just looking to make marketing claims - I think so but I have no proof - yet. I will bring out by trusty IR thermometer this winter and make more careful notes.
franco b wrote:Manufacturers of boilers for oil and gas are usually members of IBR the institute of boiler and radiator manufacturers. Until the advent of IBR and uniform standards of rating boilers it was pretty much up to the experience of the installer to properly select equipment, as ratings were not reliable.
Ratings of hand fired stoves are also wildly optimistic, requiring severe over firing to reach rated outputs. Years ago I noticed that stoves made in Germany had a stated output about half of what similar stoves made elsewhere were rated at. The German stoves reflected real world output rather than what was possible running red hot. My little Franco Belge is rated at a normal output of 48,000 BTU which means I would have to push about 100 pounds of coal through it per day. I think the stove would be too hot to approach with out special flame resistant clothing and gloves and even if you could approach it the stove would not last very long at the temperatures required to reach stated output.
If you call the manufacturer again you might ask how they arrived at their figure.
Richard
brckwlt wrote:How much coal can my aa-130 burn per day if it were to run for 24 hours straight burning pea size coal?
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group