who dat!!

pvolcko · By: **pvolcko** On: Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:33 pm

Sorry, I'm not grading on an age curve. The performance was bad. Half because of the horrible audio production. Half because the guy can't sing that way anymore. Lots of older rockers have had to adapt their performances and songs to their changed vocal and/or playing abilities. Some manage and others don't. I'd much rather have the memory and recordings of The Who live on relatively unvarnished without these guys turning in half good performances for a quick buck.

Stage and light production was top notch though.

samhill · By: **samhill** On: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:22 pm

Give the Who a break, just how many of the popular bands of today do you think will ever be around in ten years yet alone be playing a super bowl gig in their mid 60s. And its all because the producers don`t have to worry about swearing, croch grabs or clothing failures.

Kind of odd dat will be an acceptable word but retard isn`t, what are you ever going to do if the timing on your car ever gets too far advanced?

Poconoeagle · By: **Poconoeagle** On: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:31 pm

dump cold water down the carb and blow the carbon out of it to re dard dit

who dat!!

Re: who dat!!

Re: who dat!!

Re: who dat!!