dlj wrote:I'll add in a couple things based on my experience. During this past spring, I was able to run the stove with surface temperatures at 225 to 250 just idling along. I had no problem with keeping a fire at that low temp, although at night when I filled it, I would give it a lot of air to get the fire running well again.
During the coldest weather, I was running my stove hotter, 650 to 675 maybe even sometimes around 700. I went through a lot more coal that way, probably 60 to 70 pounds a day. I might even have had days where it was pretty close to 100 pounds a day. I live with three women and they all like it warm...
There's another aspect of these stoves that I don't know how to measure. They circulate the heat better than any stove I've ever used. Somehow the way all the heat deflectors are designed on the outside of this stove causes heat convection to take place that is noticeably better. I think it might rival or even equal a fan driven system. My Glenwood heated my entire house this past winter better than my forced air central heating plant works... Go figure... I live in a one story ranch, the stove is in the living room on one end of the house, the bedrooms on the other end. The bedrooms were cooler but very comfortable. I used no air circulation system other than whatever the stove does through natural convection.
I definately liked stove coal better than nut. Another thing that wasn't specified: These stoves can burn anthracite, wood AND bituminous....
dj
DOUG wrote:WOW!!!![]()
Great post! Boy was there a lot of thought put into the design of this stove! It looks like the old timers sure knew how to design and build an anthracite coal burning stove! Thank you for the more detailed information. After seeing your Glenwood Base Burner, it makes me want to get one too. Awesome stove!!
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group