If your not aching then your not working hard enough...


coal berner wrote:lsayre wrote:coal berner wrote:
it takes 24 ft x 10 ft x 6ft of seasoned hardwood at 60 % Efficiency to = 1 ton of Anthracite coal at 13.100 BTU per lb at 75% efficiency
You need a lot more wood to heat with then you do Anthracite Coal
That's 1,440 cubic feet of wood. A cord is only 128 cubic feet (8 ft. x 4 ft. x 4 ft.). Therefore 1,440 cubic ft. = 11.25 cords
It's probably closer to 1.3 to 1.5 cords of split and stacked mixed hardwoods (seasoned) to equal one ton of anthracite.
I know what a split cord of wood is I fallen split and burned plenty of wood in the past The calculation came from Penn
State collage of Agricultural Sciences Take it up with them but they are correct 24 ft x 10 ft x 6 ft season hardwood at 60 % Efficiency = 1 ton of Anthracite with a BTU Value of 13.100 btu per lb
http://energy.cas.psu.edu/ I have there Energy selector hand held slide scale so you can compare all fuels.
Cost compare Energy /Efficiency
coal
corn
electricity
firewood
# 2 Fuel oil
Natural Gas
Propane
wood pellets
but I think that's a given. Enjoy while you can my young friend.SU, that wasn't hypethetical, that was silly. freetown fred wrote:Me personally, for burning wood for about 45 yrs before switching to coal.Yes, I logged & the wood was available to me, but the process was real beneficial to the basic health I enjoy pushin 67 this May. It's a younger mans game, but I surely would not of done it different. Was my time worth anything??? Again I attribute my health to staying real physically active & to me that is quite the payback. Sure, I'm startin to fall apart![]()
but I think that's a given. Enjoy while you can my young friend.SU, that wasn't hypethetical, that was silly.

Rob R. wrote:Hey Springer, do you heat the house entirely with wood? -Or do you supplement with a "traditional" heat source like a furnace, etc?
The reason I'm asking is because I had a "coal stoker vs. wood boiler" discussion this week with a coworker. He was explaining why wood was cheaper for him...then we got to the part about him burning 300 gallons of fuel oil during the winter to supplement the wood boiler on cold nights, or when he didn't get home from work soon enough to reload the wood boiler. I had him do the math with the price of bagged coal vs. his cost for wood + 300 gallons of fuel...coal was an easy choice with the fuel factored in.
The previous owner of my home heated with wood boiler for 25+ years, and he burned mostly seasoned applewood from the local orchard. 15-16 full cords was pretty standard per winter...plus a couple hundred gallons of fuel oil for hot water in the off season. Fast forward to me heating the same house with an EFM stoker boiler, and I'm doing the same job for 9-10 tons per year. Everyone's situation is different, but anthracite costs me less than wood and all it takes is 5 minutes per day to move coal & ashes.
You can lead them to water, but you can't make them drink! You can hold their head underwater, but you still can't make them open their mouths. Some folks will never see the Forest, the damned trees are always in the way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group