"Junk" or "Bad" Coal

Forum rules
ATTN Coal Dealers: To advertise your company you're allowed to start one new topic in "Coal Prices, Coal Quality, Coal Dealer Inquiries and Reviews". You may also respond to other topics started by others where your company has been mentioned and are encouraged to do so. Any other posts just for advertising here or anywhere else on nepacrossroads.com will be considered spam and removed. Repeated violations will result in a permanent ban.

"Junk" or "Bad" Coal

PostBy: jrn8265 On: Mon Oct 04, 2010 1:20 pm

Been seeing some mentioning the above. What is it? Is there actually Anthracite that will not burn? I had a real nice delivery of shiny "clean" rice from a new source and even though it looks real pretty I am concerned that it may not burn...can this happen? ..won't find out for a few more weeks when I lite her up....appreciate your feedback!
jrn8265
 
Stove/Furnace Make: Keystoker Koker
Stove/Furnace Model: Koker 160

Re: "Junk" or "Bad" Coal

PostBy: SMITTY On: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:08 pm

I have had coal that I'd call "less than ideal", but never "junk". The stuff kept me warm, but produced so much ash that I had to tend to it every 12 hours, vs. every 24 hours for the better quality coal. At the time it was the only coal I'd ever burned, so I didn't know what I was missing. My supplier raised their price quite a bit, so I found another supplier ... and the better coal to boot. Was a win-win.
SMITTY
 
Stoker Coal Boiler: Patriot Coal - custom built by Jim Dorsey
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harman Mark III (not currently in use)
Coal Size/Type: Rice / Blaschak anthracite
Other Heating: Oil fired Burnham boiler

Re: "Junk" or "Bad" Coal

PostBy: Richard S. On: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:23 pm

Usually the problem will be a lot of rock in it, might be from a culm bank that was processed.

jrn8265 wrote:I had a real nice delivery of shiny "clean" rice from a new source and even though it looks real pretty I am concerned that it may not burn...can this happen?


Have you tried it yet? Having said that the problem here might be it's too good. There's coal that gets so hard and dense it may be troublesome to keep it burning. Needs more air and longer burn time. This is usually a problematic with the stokers, you need to adjust with more air and less of feed rate if possible.
Richard S.
 
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite

Visit Lehigh Anthracite

Re: "Junk" or "Bad" Coal

PostBy: jrn8265 On: Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:21 am

Thanks all!

I don't think the coal is too hard as I can break pieces between my fingers. I'll know if a week or so!
jrn8265
 
Stove/Furnace Make: Keystoker Koker
Stove/Furnace Model: Koker 160

Re: "Junk" or "Bad" Coal

PostBy: RAYJAY On: Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:29 pm

i had coal a couple of years ago that burned like *censored*. lots of ash and slag , then i got smart and started to haul my own its cheaper also
RAYJAY
 
Stoker Coal Boiler: VAN WERT - 600 VA HOT WATER
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: HARMAN- MAGUM STOKER
Coal Size/Type: BUCKWHEAT ON BOTH
Other Heating: NG BOILER

Visit Lehigh Anthracite