My main question is what works best for insulating the boiler under the jacket?
New EFM's use fiberglass insulation.
My main question is what works best for insulating the boiler under the jacket?
CoalBurner5 wrote:R 13 is 3.5inches thick just thought that might be a little to thick for under the jacket.
stokerscot wrote:CoalBurner5 wrote:I've found that i will get a back draft through the air intake of the oil gun when i push the air up to high. I am planning on extending the chimney another 2 ft come spring, but till then it's a no go.
Right, i'm hoping to adjust the hi low tomorrow sometime.
I'm going to insulate the boiler in the upcoming week or so, any suggestions of what to use for insulation?
Do you have the cap on the oil gun. It's supposed to be there when not using the oil gun to protect the oil gun and to stop the,,,,,,,,, backdrafts.
stoker-man wrote:The only thing that determines output is how far does the worm turn each stroke of the stoker. The S-20 can move 10-11 teeth each stroke.
Wood'nCoal wrote:My main question is what works best for insulating the boiler under the jacket?
New EFM's use fiberglass insulation.
stoker-man wrote:Shear pins are designed to break at 25 foot pounds of torque.
coal berner wrote:stoker-man wrote:The only thing that determines output is how far does the worm turn each stroke of the stoker. The S-20 can move 10-11 teeth each stroke.
Wrong the original AP-520 with the large gerabox with the S-20 had a feed rate of 20lbs max which is 8 teeth max
each tooth is 2.5 lbs per hr of coal with Rice size coal It is 2lbs per hr per tooth 16lbs 8 teeth max on the older S-20
with Buckwheat size coal On the newer S-20 Small gear box is 10 teeth 20lbs per hr max
The S-15 stoker with the smaller pot had a max feed rate of 15lbs per hr 6 teeth max.
it was not until the DF model with the smaller gear box that you had a max feed rate of 25lbs per hr 10teeth
now with a simple modifaction you can get them to run 14 to 15 teeth out of them 35lbs per hr to 37.5 lbs per hr .
I have the EFM Spec.sheets that show these stats Showing the feed rate of the original AP-520 S-20 AP-350 S-15 & with the S-20 AP-700 AP-900 AP-1300.
As well as actually Running and having hands on these units testing them at the shop.
coal berner wrote:stoker-man wrote:The only thing that determines output is how far does the worm turn each stroke of the stoker. The S-20 can move 10-11 teeth each stroke.
Wrong the original AP-520 with the large gerabox with the S-20 had a feed rate of 20lbs max which is 8 teeth max
Pacowy wrote:coal berner wrote:stoker-man wrote:The only thing that determines output is how far does the worm turn each stroke of the stoker. The S-20 can move 10-11 teeth each stroke.
Wrong the original AP-520 with the large gearbox with the S-20 had a feed rate of 20lbs max which is 8 teeth max
each tooth is 2.5 lbs per hr of coal with Rice size coal It is 2lbs per hr per tooth 16lbs 8 teeth max on the older S-20
with Buckwheat size coal On the newer S-20 Small gear box is 10 teeth 20lbs per hr max
The S-15 stoker with the smaller pot had a max feed rate of 15lbs per hr 6 teeth max.
it was not until the DF model with the smaller gear box that you had a max feed rate of 25lbs per hr 10teeth
now with a simple modification you can get them to run 14 to 15 teeth out of them 35lbs per hr to 37.5 lbs per hr .
I have the EFM Spec.sheets that show these stats Showing the feed rate of the original AP-520 S-20 AP-350 S-15 & with the S-20 AP-700 AP-900 AP-1300.
As well as actually Running and having hands on these units testing them at the shop.
Could you please reconcile these S-20 numbers with the information you presented in another thread (EFM, Keystoker, or AHS, 6/14/2008), where you said that on a Highboy, "the feed rate went from 1 to 10 teeth 2.5 lbs a hr. to 25lbs a hr stoker was a S-20...The standard 520 ...also use the S-20 stoker...". That post didn't say anything about 16 lb/hr.
Perhaps mistakenly, I thought (from EFM literature) that the EFM stokers originally were "named" according to their max throughput of buckwheat. With the S-20 some users had problems with buck (stress with long augers, fumes with short augers) so EFM began to recommend using rice instead of buck in the S-20. They found that the same auger moves more rice than buck (2.5 vs. 2.0 lb/tooth/hr), so the throughput of the stoker depends on rice vs. buck. If there really was an S-20 that burned 16 lb/hr of buck, I'd like to see the literature on it. I would also be curious as to whether anyone has achieved a satisfactory burn in an S-20 modified to 35+ lb/hr as you describe.
Thanks.
Mike
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group