Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: lsayre On: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:29 pm

The amazing thing is that if the Federal Government was still being properly defined and limited in its scope by the Constitution we would not be having this discussion. Everything boils down to the sworn oath and the honor of those sworn to uphold the letter of the Constitution.
Stoker Coal Boiler: AHS S130 Coal Gun
Coal Size/Type: Stockton Anthracite Pea
Other Heating: Resistance Boiler (13.5 KW)

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: jpete On: Mon Mar 26, 2012 8:42 pm

samhill wrote:Jpete, I would suggest that you look up every other country on this planet, find one that you like & run there as fast as you possibly can before you drive yourself totally insane. Think what you want but leave me out of all this negative America is coming to get you crap. See ya.

Ah! The old "America! Love it or leave it!" defense.

Well played Sam, well played.

Stick you head back in the sand and pretend everything is fine. I'm sure nothing bad will happen.
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harman Mk II
Coal Size/Type: Stove, Nut, Pea
Other Heating: Dino juice

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: KLook On: Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:28 pm

Havn't been in for a few days, gotta congrat Francob for his spunk at 80! I am 28 years your junior and I grew up with a bunch of vets from Europe and the Pacific. Most of them were unlike anyone I know today. Not sure how to define it better. And I heard many of them say years ago that it was time for another revolution in this country. They knew what they fought for and they knew it was being taken away.


And the love it or leave it proves you are losing Sam!
Stoker Coal Boiler: Harman VF 3000
Coal Size/Type: rice, bagged, Blaschak
Stove/Furnace Model: VF 3000

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: samhill On: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:56 am

Doesn't prove anything except that I'm tired of this crap Kevin, I'll stand by my statement that there is very little patriotism left even after 9/11 it was a fleeting moment in time, only a few months then right back to the me, me, me what's in it for me attitude. We have become a nation that is comfortable at war so as long as "me" isn't affected directly "me" does't care.
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: keystoker 160
Hand Fed Coal Stove: hitzer 75 in garage
Stove/Furnace Make: keystoker/hitzer
Stove/Furnace Model: koker 160/ hitzer 75

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: jpete On: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:32 am

Patriotism =/= letting government do whatever it wants...
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harman Mk II
Coal Size/Type: Stove, Nut, Pea
Other Heating: Dino juice

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: cokehead On: Thu Aug 16, 2012 12:07 am

jpete wrote:
samhill wrote:We could argue the use of the meaning of words & get no where just like this whole thing has been going. So now a law means nothing if you don't agree with it, I'm sure you could find many that agree. I personally feel that it is OK to obey the law even if I feel it isn't moral, right or just but doing so will keep me out of jail. Remember he who has the gold makes the rules.

Did you take an oath to uphold the Constitution?

If someone made a law that was unconstitutional, and ordered you to enforce it, what would you do?

Ever hear of the concept of nullification? Ever hear of the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions?

If you think it's possible to learn from history, maybe you can learn a few things from them.

I think this is relevant.
Stove/Furnace Make: Locke, Godin, Tarm in da works
Stove/Furnace Model: Warm Morning 617-A, 3721, 502

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: RogerHWerner On: Tue May 12, 2015 10:11 pm

Some of the responses on this forum astound me because they treat an enormously complex topic with overly simplistic responses. Cutting to the chase: One either trusts government to respond to national emergencies or one does not. If trust exists, then Obama's executive order is perfectly reasonable in light of almost 100 years of near continuous encroachment on individual liberties in times of national emergencies. The big question; in fact, the only question that matters is this: What constitutes a national emergency and should each be treated the same way?

Ask yourselves this question: What should we do if the present worldwide fiat currency regime collapses under the weight of unrepayable debt? What would you do if banks closed, ATM machines stopped working, and you were unable to access your money for say a week? What would you do if that $5,000.00 you thought you had was only worth $2,500.00 but all of your bills remained unchanged? These are relevant questions. How on Earth could government realistic control use of private water wells? In California, there is a movement afoot to meter private wells and begin charging for use of water. Many think this is outrageous...but is it? Who is paying for ground water recharge? Is water any different than other public natural resources? The public owns the airwaves so why not underground water? When your well runs dry because ground water levels have dropped 100 ft what could you do regards remediation? If wells were metered government could then easily control private water usage: That's the trade off. In times of emergency should everyone be required to sacrifice for the common good or should those with private wells be permitted to do as they wish with could be legitimately argued is a public natural resource.

Bottom line too many people think shortsightedly and they are not prepared. Before the complaints begin let me say that in many cases I cannot blame all individuals for lack of preparedness. Too many Americans life month to month without savings or reserves. I am 64, and my wife and I have spent our adult lives preparing for virtually any scenario. That's why I have reserves on which to rely upon on an emergency; financial reserves not in any financial institution. I am also capable of defending my property, and can provide energy and food for extended periods. We sacrificed possession of luxuries for what we possess.

Something that we all much consider: Government is responsible for 300,000,000 people not just you and I. For the most part, I trust government to concern itself with the nation's general welfare. That's their responsibility. Watching out for my personal interests is my responsibility. I sometimes think Americans expect to much from their government.

Something I recently read gives me cause for hope. In a recent issue of New Yorker, an investigative reporter studied what happens after a national disaster. What he discovered is that the lurid media reports of disease and violence are simply false: There is no documented evidence that diseases and or violence increase over their normal occurrences. Consider the Hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans and your own memories of this tragedy...what comes to mind? Looting, rioting, murder, rape.... The truth is an open secret and well documented: Media and political reports of violence and looting during the disaster did not exceed normal levels of crime within the city. I checked the article's facts and the author is correct. Were there major screw ups before, during, and after the disaster? You bet there were and they were committed by inept and corrupt politicians dating back to the 1960s. These individuals will never pay for their behavior. That's the real story of Katrina. 93% of the affected people were black and racism seems to have been the underlying reason why New Orleans was so unprepared for a completely predictable event and why the media focused on violence. Hell, everyone knows that black youths are violent thugs waiting for a chance to strike. We have the largest prison population in the world to prove it. I say facetiously that we should be proud of ourselves.

Back to my original question: Can we trust government? The answer is not a simple one and, I would argue both yes and no. Government doesn't always act in a way that is consistent with the public welfare but much of the time it does. Does government behavior often conflict with what's in my personal interest? Of course it does but that doesn't cause me to lose faith in government. I am just one person out of 300,000,000. Personally, I believe that we are governed by the best government business can buy but then I ask; whose fault is that? The fault is ours. We the people fell asleep, we stopped paying attention, and we placed to much trust in our elected officials. We failed in our obligation to provide oversight of government behavior and so today we have a government that nominally watches out for our interests but what Calvin Coolidge once said almost 90 years ago: The business of America is business. We permitted Coolidge's aphorism to become a reality. If our government is overly interventionist we have only ourselves to blame. Dwight Eisenhower warned us about the power of the military industrial complex and we ignored his warning.

So, what to do? I certainly wouldn't worry about a government agency confiscating your well water: How could that be realistically accomplished? My point is that it cannot be done. There aren't enough inspectors to check such behavior. In California we're in the 4th year of a drought. The drought is real. It isn't the fault of a government conspiracy. Perhaps government should have declared an emergency two years ago but such a decision is or was politically untenable. Today, our water rationing is largely voluntary and if we go over our allocation we pay a higher rate. I have no problem with that. I'd support even stricter rationing. All of our outdoor watering is on drip irrigation. Only a moron would view this situation and ignore it and that includes those who own private wells.

In Fresno County, abuse of ground water for agricultural purposes has caused subsidence; in some locations, surface elevations have dropped over 100 ft from their 1900 level. I've seen the physical evidence for this. Drought effects ground water and anyone with commonsense will think beyond their own needs. If we cannot that of the common good then we have no right to survive as a country. There are some who believe we'd be better off breaking up the United States into separate nations. I disagree. If the world was sane, if there weren't fanatics anxious to die for a cause, people who would gladly kill me and my family and move into my home without so much as changing the bed sheets; perhaps smaller nations makes economic sense because they are better equipped to address our personal needs. However, small nations don't fair so well in our very dangerous world. The only reason we live the way we do is because of our size and our population and our power as a nation. The problem as I see it is that we the people haven't thought like a nation that in a long time. Perhaps globalization has affected the west more than any other population set. While we have purchased cheap t-shirts and running shoes at Wal-Mart; while we kick back with a beer and watch businesses have bought our government and diluted our sense of what it means to be American.

I'm hardly an ardent nationalist but neither am I a neoliberal internationalist. I'm a realist. We live in an ugly and dangerous world, and, the only thing that keeps lunatics at bay is our ability to protect ourselves. However, therein lies the great danger. How far should we the people permit government to go in protecting us. We come full circle back to Obama's executive order. When we view this executive order in light of almost 100 years of comparable legislative and executive actions, the document doesn't bother me because it largely clarifies and simplifies almost 75 existing documents. Anyone interested in some of the more important documents affecting our freedoms just indicate an interest and I shall provide the links. I'd be willing to bet that 1 American a 1,000, perhaps 1 in 10,000, wouldn't know about 50% or more of them. Many of them have been on the books since World War II and the oldest date to the Wilson administration's War Production Board.

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: SWPaDon On: Tue May 12, 2015 10:18 pm

Helluva first post, RogerHWerner

Welcome to the forum.
Hand Fed Coal Furnace: Clayton 1600M
Coal Size/Type: Bituminous
Other Heating: Oil furnace that hasn't been fired in 14 years

Re: Does this executive order signed 3/16 nationalize industry?

PostBy: jpete On: Tue May 12, 2015 10:25 pm

RogerHWerner wrote:What should we do if the present worldwide fiat currency regime collapses under the weight of unrepayable debt? .

If you and I were the last people on Earth, and I claimed a monopoly on money production, and I loaned you $1 to be paid back with interest, how could you ever do it?

All fiat debt is unrepayable from the word go. That's the part people don't understand.
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harman Mk II
Coal Size/Type: Stove, Nut, Pea
Other Heating: Dino juice