samhill wrote:Better watch what & how you propose things Richard, I heard no mention of anything but coffee to be put into those disposable cups. Don't you realize that other beverages have feelings also & that's not even mentioning the obvious total disregard you have toward decaf, what's your problem with decaf? Then are there going to be different departments for hot & cold or do you expect to be able to locate enough relatives that can do both hot & cold, caffeinated & decaf, plus all the different flavors of soft & possibly alcoholic beverages. Are you then proposing a Fed. Gov. funded training facility capable of training said personal in a timely manor & if so in which state? I would highly suggest that a committee be formed just to discuss the feasibility of such an action, impacts on society & then submit the results to a Congressional Cup Support Study Commission to be made up of all non-bias female members.
I'm On Fire wrote:The hot vs cold debate is covered on page 4.3384987,8717677.32211888 section 2000000 paragraph 4000000000 line 9000.
After 2 years of intensive research using the 2 million appropriated for the hot vs. cold debate we have conclusively determined that hot is hot and cold is cold. Further funding will be required to determine exactly where could and hot meet, what is "screaming *censored* hot" and what exactly is meant by "my balls are in my throat cold".
cokehead wrote:he whole problem would be solved if we all just used virtual cups



NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group