Sandusky Guilty

Here's the latest on the Sandusky investigation, could be political or maybe just trying to find out exactly what went on to allow it to continue. In either event it doesn't sound like an adult thing to do, if it were to be along party line then the con's have the majority (I think) so what's the big deal other than to have how you voted made public?
http://blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/phi ... s-and-flee

The proper protocol is that if a viable bill is brought up with backing then it goes to the floor to be voted either up or down, if down then it's done with unless it's rewritten with changes & resubmitted. Just like on the Fed level they have voted on the same thing over 30 times. Who wouldn't want to know the whats & whys things weren't done to at the very least remove Sandusky from easy access to young boys & prevent some from being abused? Take away the political thing for awhile & think about what is the right thing to do, do you do a proper investigation or do you possibly allow someone that could have done something to stop it to walk. All for the sake of a football program.

Then your in favor of letting someone go scott free rather than investigating because of who they are or what position they hold or did I misunderstand?

Sure won't disagree about tool gate ED being a skunk but Corbett was the AG under Rendell, took a big campaign donation from Sandusky & then gave a big grant to Sandusky's non profit, paid him back with our money while on the board at PS.