jpete wrote:I'm looking forward to voting for him in 2016.
lsayre wrote:jpete wrote:I'm looking forward to voting for him in 2016.
I concur! Although I believe that for Rand Paul to be a candidate for President in 2016 he will most likely have to go the independent route. Unlike the Dem's, who have a penchant for thrusting virtual unknowns into the Presidential limelight, the Republicans are entrenched deeply with the idea that many years of dues paying are required before they will permit you to be their candidate of choice.
jpete wrote:I think after four more years of Obama, they'll be willing to take a chance.
SMITTY wrote:My main concern is not the presidency - it's both Houses (especially the Senate). We desperately need PRINCIPLED occupants there, along with the House. Progressives in BOTH parties need to go, NOW.
This needs to start at home ... on your street ... in your town. It needs to start at the bottom and work it's way up. Then, and only then, God willing, we will have FULLY taken our country back. The movement has already started. People are finally waking up. I have hope again.
SMITTY wrote:My main concern is not the presidency - it's both Houses (especially the Senate). We desperately need PRINCIPLED occupants there, along with the House. Progressives in BOTH parties need to go, NOW.
This needs to start at home ... on your street ... in your town. It needs to start at the bottom and work it's way up. Then, and only then, God willing, we will have FULLY taken our country back. The movement has already started. People are finally waking up. I have hope again.
jpete wrote:The local republican party doesn't want me and everyone else calls me a kook!
samhill wrote:some say the Supreme Court doesn't have to be listened to.
Says Thomas Jefferson, among other distinguished Americans. His draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 first introduced the word “nullification” into American political life, and follow-up resolutions in 1799 employed Jefferson’s formulation that “nullification…is the rightful remedy” when the federal government reaches beyond its constitutional powers. In the Virginia Resolutions of 1798, James Madison said the states were “duty bound to resist” when the federal government violated the Constitution.
franco b wrote:jpete wrote:The local republican party doesn't want me and everyone else calls me a kook!
I don't think you are a kook at all. I think you are absolutely right in your belief in the supremacy of the individual. It's just your strategy and tactics I think are bad.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group