Blatant LIES from Obama about Benghazi warrant many ?'s

Yanche wrote:There's clearly more going on with the Libyan embassy security responsibilities than the public is being told. I live 30-35 miles from Washington, DC and some of the local press is talking about various congressional committees saying the security responsibility was assigned to the "OGA", Other Government Agency. This is a common Washington euphemism for the CIA. If that's the case clearly the CIA wasn't on the job. That could explain why the state dept. officials said, don't sent anymore requests for more security. They just couldn't tell the people making the request who's job it was. It's also obvious the CIA was/is quite involved in Libya and many of their ground personnel are contractors. All and all a very murky shadowy situation. Unfortunately, several lost their lives. And this election season is using it to make political hay. Some in Congress have apparently let some of the secrets slip to exploit it. What a divisive time we live in.

no doubt in my mind its deep and murky.

if you want one of your 'assets' to "go away", simply deny security......oops so sorry, bye bye.

Now look be fair to the guy, he has a lot on his plate. Priority 50 was reviewing security of his assets and staff overseas.
Sadly priority 49 came first - hey the mans busy.

http://theclicker.today.com/_news/2012/ ... -idol-feud

phkn idot.

CNB, let me get this straight, attacks that occurred on 9/11 are not about 9/11 & total lapses in security(he'as in charge are not about poor security. OK now I can see how we learn nothing from past mistakes, thanks for clearing that up.

Hey clueless, when a President (he's in charge - get it) allows an important ME asset to to be guarded by five unarmed non US nationals that is stupidity. Should not be so hard to understand even for an intellectual. Here we go yet again diversion by quoting historical events.Your little blue book must be dog eared by now. I don't care about Julius Cesars guard detail, Reagans security practices etc.etc. Try to stay on track, I know it's hard when you are defending the undefendable.

Well clued in, those five people weren't all guards or even supposed to be there for at least one. You see we somewhere along the line decided to farm out security but you already knew all that. It's cheaper that way & that wasn't really a Embassy but instead a rental again you knew that I'm sure. No diversion, it's what it is, I didn't know about it until I looked into it but then again I try & find things out instead of running my mouth.

Again you have no sense of responsibility like your leader. Libya has changed and as things change you make new decisions (duh -get it). When the US govt assigns people overseas, or in fact anywhere their safety is paramount. So it's OK to buy 500MM rounds of ammo to guard DHS facilities and the outhouses/tea rooms in govt facilities etc. based in the US of course but in Libya we need nothing but stern words and a handful of rocks. Stupid is as stupid does. The fixations are bad today-yes?

... and as Sam has to have the last word his silly comeback to this is......... insert post here....

And when did this all start? Mind you I'm not saying it's right IMO we shouldn't have even had anybody there until if & when there should ever be a stable Gov.. If Americans want to live & do business there that's on them, none of these countries are annexes of this country, let them run theirs & we should run ours & stay out of their business.

Sam, Sam, Sam, just the facts please... our ambassador got murdered remember? So yet again your hopes for the future of the world are not germain to this thread. Stay on track (for the tenth time).

OK sorry, we need more outhouses. Hows that subject wise?

samhill wrote:If Americans want to live & do business there that's on them,

That was actually possible until Obama went and asked the dirty corrupt UN to deal with Libya. Now, a month later, he's "considering" sending military force over there, not because he's an American, not because he's a good leader, but solely and obviously to garner votes in any way he can and deflect his absolute incompetance. By now everybody knows he's neglectful of security briefings, Campaigner in Chief.. So he can continue implementing his Marxist takeover of our beloved country. And to think that lying pig Susan Rice is in line for Secretary of State.
Keep buttering your bread on both sides, maybe you can hold it by the edges.

Latest news is we've been sending troops to Jordan ( I THINK that's the country - I may have them mixed up ...) since this past Wednesday. Apparently the muslim brotherhood is over there demanding the president of Jordan -- EDIT (I f'ed up the story ...) -- dismantle his government or face massive muslim brotherhood protests... and they obliged.

So .... who are we going over there to support? Our longtime friend - the president of Jordan ..... or the muslim brotherhood? Will be interesting to see this play out .....

Yep- MORE breaking news. Hillary is accepting all responsibility for the Benghazi B/S.

Wonder how much Obama had to pay her for that one? Not that she's free from fault, but stuff like this usually starts at the top.

Meanwhile, our local news is reporting on stinkbugs .... a naked caveman ....... and a kid in a black riceburner running turkeys over .... Gotta love the MSM for reporting the "IMPORTANT" .... "NEWS".

Meanwhile, our borders are nearly wide open, our government infiltrated at the highest levels, our economy on the verge of collapse, and plans for widespread race riots if Obama loses the election. Way to work, MSM ...

I said way back in the beginning of this post that someone was going to have to fall on their sword for the greater good. Looks like Hillary Clinton is going to do it, Holder took his turn. Grandfather used to say, it takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I guess Hillary's the only one with balls near the white house. Mabe the left elected the wrong man for the job.

No balls on Clinton either. If she fell on any sword it's because she has been told there is no consequences to the 2016 Pres bid. All three are snakes in the grass.

Ok guys - from what I've learned just this past week, this situation DWARFS WATERGATE by a GIGANTIC margin!!!

Turns out, there's alot more to this story than the Obama administration and our USLESS AND TRAITOROUS mainstream media will let us all know.

Our government had Ambassador Chris Stevens on LIVE FEED via cameras in the safehouse (where he was negotiating arms with Turkish & al qaida operatives), AND via drones overhead. The administration IGNORED his pleas for more security, AND, when the other branches of intelligence simultaneously viewing the same feed scrambled to assemble forces to go in for defense, they were told NO! What did Obama do after this? He went to bed!!! I think Romney himself needs to break this story during the debate, since nobody else besides The Blaze TV will.

The story starts with Libya & Moamarr Khadafi. Obama wanted to take the guy out, but didn't want to look bad using our forces .... so he arranged for al quaida, the muslim brotherhood, and a few other bad guys to do our dirty work. Mission accomplished ... but now Obama wants Assad of Syria gone. Negotiating with the same groups in addition to the Turkish government is what lead to the bloodshed there recently. Now our ambassador was in the middle of this arms swap mess when he was killed. Lots more to this story that NEEDS to come out NOW!!!

SMITTY wrote:I think Romney himself needs to break this story during the debate, since nobody else besides The Blaze TV will.

Well, Smitty, I guess he decided not to; maybe a good strategy.

I heard another Obama story today; my friend was talking to one of her friends, whose husband went to Iraq to be a plumber as a civilian contractor. The MSM won't talk about how many civilian contractors were killed in Iraq. Obama came over and wanted to see the Kenyan contractors first. Made the American contractors furious, Kenyans suposedly never had anybody's back if there was danger.
Obama did a great slick job of defending his foreign policy last night, but the fact is his appeasment policy has caused the middle east to be way more unstable, IMO.