VP debate

Do you feel Ryan or Biden won

Poll ended at Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:39 pm

Ryan
18
62%
Biden
5
17%
Draw
6
21%
 
Total votes : 29

VP debate

PostBy: Flyer5 On: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:39 pm

Who do you feel won the VP Debate
Flyer5
 
Stoker Coal Boiler: Leisure Line WL110
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: Leisure Line Pioneer

Re: VP debate

PostBy: Ed.A On: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:57 pm

Never saw one like it. Biden was was off the rails, couldn't contain himself or even try to act VP like. Surprised? yes and no. Was I expecting JOe to be a wall flower, hell no, but his smirking, laughing and head shaking was distracting and disjointed, I expected more panche,

Ryan, I thought was very Presidential....almost too much so. I thought he allowed Biden to much leeway and let him talk over him too much.


While scoring this one, my wife was clearly going Ryan, I on the other hand thought the heavy /nasty Biden came out on top.

W'ell have to wait on the "experts" say and the newest polling.
Ed.A
 
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: Alaska Channing III/ '94 Stoker II
Coal Size/Type: Rice

Re: VP debate

PostBy: pvolcko On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:22 am

Ryan, but only because Biden lost it.

I'm biased toward Ryan on substance, but taken as a debate and only on what was said in the debate, the substance of the two more or less balanced out. It was he said, he said. No clear and away winner as far as one of them having the better case as presented.

So, style and presentation and command of the debate: Biden drove the debate. He did it by interrupting Ryan at nearly every point he started to develop a cogent point of argument, which broke Ryan's stride and had him wasting a lot of his clock restating in order to present a coherent statement, at which point Biden would interrupt again. As a debate strategy it works, when you're allowed to get away with it, and Biden was allowed (by both Ryan and the moderator). It diminished the debate as a whole and made it borderline unwatchable, but it is a time honored way of seizing control. Point, Biden.

So if Biden was even on substance and ahead on control, then how did he lose? Because of his demeanor. The smiling, the laughing, the dismissive remarks at the start of each of his time periods, the malarky, the stuff (Irish you know)... He made it damn near impossible to watch the debate he was otherwise on pace to win. I'm guessing that a great number of people started off watching the debate and by 30 minutes in there were maybe 2/3s of the initial viewership, 45mins in, half. And it was probably independents and undecideds that were tuning out. They aren't going to remember what the candidates said. They're only going to remember "the Biden guy was an *censored*, I hate people like that". Leaving only his base, who probably gobbled up the aggressive tone and over the top asshattery of his demeanor as a nice consolation after the drubbing Obama took last week, and the republican base, who wanted to see what Ryan was made of and see if the team could pull off another runaway upset.

So Biden lost it by being a totally unlikeable douche during the debate. This was not the expected way he was too lose, if he was to lose at all. Biden is affable. He says the darnedest things, but he's generally a humble, everyman sort of guy that is easy to like on a personal level. He connects. Tonight he was not the Joe we've known all these years. He was an ass, bestowing zero respect on his "friend" he was debating or the people watching. He was not presidential in the least. He was barely adult.

For his part, Ryan was a bit too accepting of the interruptions and smug dismissals. He let himself get dragged off point a couple times and in recovering from interruption he lost time in the rehash. He had his facts and figures. He had his arguments. He wasn't smooth in delivery all the time. He stumbled here and there and left some easy points of argument on the table. However, he was presidential, even if not the best debater in the world. He held his own against a seasoned veteran of the game, even when that seasoned veteran was borderline manic in his presentation. He did no harm, but he did little good either.

What lessons can be gleaned?

1) Obama can be a bit more aggressive in his style next week, but he can not do what Biden did, no matter how much his base might like it. Romney was aggressive without being an ass about it. He was respectful and at least came off as sincere. His interruptions were usually short lived and just to clarify a particular point Obama tried to get away with. Biden interrupted too, but he did it not to clarify but to obstruct and at times seemingly to filibuster. And his demeanor before, during, and after made it all come off as unseamly and uncomfortable to watch. Obama needs to be careful not to fall into this same trap.

2) Romney needs to put a little more meat on at least some of the 5 point plan. Pick one or two items and intend to put out some specfic ideas he will present if elected president. Don't phrase them as promises or anything. Say, here's some ideas on how to get 12 million more people employed in X years time. They may not all happen, there will be other ideas I put forth and that the democrats will put forth. This is a starting point and ideas I know will work. Same for tax reform, particularly on deductions he'd put on the table along with his tax cut plans. He should be prepared to do this on each of the 5 points if pressed by Obama or the moderator, but he should come with the intent to actively get ideas out there on two of the points of the plan. He's already done this in pieces over the past few months, he needs to present it and consolidate it into the town hall "debate" next week. The town hall format will lend itself well to this. The format will largely prevent interruptions from the opponent. You basically get 2-4 minute blocks of time to make a mini-speech on each question subject.

3) Romney and Obama both need to work the likeability angle. Romney got a big bump on the likability question from the last debate. He needs to solidify that during the town hall. Can't be stilted or canned in his responses. Has to connect and present a majority of the answers in terms people can grasp simply and perhaps even emotionally. Obama has the opposite problem, he lost likeability in the last debate. A little bit of Biden's stench will follow him too. He's got to reestablish on this front in order to have a chance at getting the independents he lost back in his camp. The town hall format should aid him greatly in this effort.

4) Romney needs to have some lines of attack to bring to bear on the recent unemployment reports (monthly and latest weekly). The numbers are out of whack good. He can't take the Jack Welch line of attack (at least not without some clear proof of how the numbers were fudged), but he has to be able to point out how the numbers are almost surely going to be "corrected" in the next report because the figures in there simply do not make a lick of sense given the poor GDP growth we've been operating under. Does anyone seriously believe over 800,000 people found either full time or part time work in the last month? How does the college age demographic actually show job growth in Sept when that month always shows job losses for that demo historically speaking? And news today that the latest weekly numbers are skewed by one large unnamed state having been late to get their figures reported to the BLS. Obama is almost surely going to tout these unemployment reports and try to fold it into a "things are getting better" narrative. Romney needs to be able to undercut the reports without looking like he's undercutting America or being capriciously partisan, and in a way people will grasp without a chart. Maybe the strategy is not to directly undercut the reports, but to focus on what people are experiencing in their lives and communities and how this isn't recovery, it is stagnation and decline in real life terms.

One last thing: Libya, Fast and Furious: I don't know if it will hit the fan for Obama in time for the next debate, but the way the attack in Libya has been handled has been an unmitigated debacle. It is either gross incompetence or a work of internal administration sabotage unlike we've seen before. Either way it isn't good and there's no way the media is going to be able to keep it from glowing red hot for weeks. Similarly, the F&F scandal festers. The univision special report exposed a whole other side to this thing that is arguably far worse than how it played out domestically with the killing of one or two agents. And now the attack that resulted in a death in Yemen. Iran nukes. Obama is highly vulnerable on the foreign policy front. I don't know how much of the town hall will play into this subject area, but the last debate is all foreign policy. It's going to come at him and he has to be ready with more game than what his administration has brought on these topics in the last month's time.
pvolcko
 


Re: VP debate

PostBy: plumb-r On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:16 am

Biden was very un-vice presidentual. No class at all! In my mind, that more than content lost the debate for Biden. Is that how he acts when talking leaders of foreign nations? :dancing: I bet Obama's practicing so much he's sick of debates. It's not going to help he needs a teleprompter. :rofl:
plumb-r
 
Stove/Furnace Make: Hitzer
Stove/Furnace Model: 608 Energy Master I Stoker

Re: VP debate

PostBy: freetown fred On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:46 am

Like Ed, I was real befuddled with Biden acting like a school yard idiot with the head shaking, laughing & smirking--like all us viewers knew what the private joke was :( On the other side, Ryan is not a debater, but I think gave it a decent shot. I don't think this debate will be a winner or loser for either side. Looking foward to next Pres. debate! I think pv pretty well summed it up.
freetown fred
 
Hand Fed Coal Stove: HITZER 50-93
Coal Size/Type: BLASCHAK Nut/Stove mix

Re: VP debate

PostBy: Dann757 On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:03 am

Biden was so effective I almost turned democrat. The dumbed down masses may have believed most of his BS. He actually had me doubting my own party. Ryan just couldn't seem to counter many of his very agressive approaches. He held his own ground. The facts of the last four years were pretty well whitewashed by Biden. Slick politician that really got all ready to go on the offensive. The fact-checkers will be able to nullify a lot of Biden's statements.
biden outright lied about knowing about Benghazi, that will come out. He dismissed Iran as a threat out of hand. When he repeated that they don't have anything to put weapons grade fissile material in, that was ignorant. There's a thread elsewhere here about how the Germans got an American base heater design in the 1800's and copied it. Why, because was a good design that had already been implemented. Same with an implosion or cannon type nuke. The hard part was getting the material, it just has to be brought to critical mass very quickly and the designs are already out there. Iran won't threaten Israel with a nuke, they will use it as soon as they get it. They want global holy war, it's their goal.
Ryan pointed out that Obamacare will force Catholic institutions to provide contraception against their beliefs; Biden countered by calling that a lie; and saying how dare the repubs try to force catholic values on the usa with their anti abortion stance. Clever.
I hope people will be thinking about the price of gas, the slow recovery, the botched foreign policy; when they go to vote.

Excellent well thought out post Pvolko!
Dann757
 

Re: VP debate

PostBy: whistlenut On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:15 am

It was strange to see "SUPER WHITE TEETH" and a Playground Bully' try to cast himself off as being #1 to be President, if anything happened to #1. I was not impressed, and through the grace of God, Ryan remained a gentleman; was logical; steadfast; and himself more demanding of respect than our current "#2 Stoker Joe". Do you suppose that 'Anal Implant' was the reason for the flailing arms and head tossing and laughing jags he suffered from? Joe sure needs some help with operational parameters for both air...and fuel rate. How many times did we hear: Look Martha.....have a twitch, and try to 'flash us with all those Dental Implants. I'm shocked he didn't have them 'lettered: 'Barry and Joe in 2012'. Painful, absolutely painful.
We get 20 calls a day up here simply because we are suppose to be a 'critical swing state'. THAT crap is annoying..... :shock: :shock:

4 more years of the Inmates running the Asylum? NFW! If you don't vote your conscience this time, there may not be another chance. :mad: :shock: :roll:
whistlenut
 
Stoker Coal Boiler: AA130's,260's, AHS130&260's,EFM900,GJ&VanWert
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Franks Boiler,Itasca415,NYer130,Van Wert
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Yellow Flame
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: Alaska-4,Keystoker-2,
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Alaska,Gibraltor,Keystone,Vc Vigilant 2
Hand Fed Coal Furnace: Van Wert, NYer's, Ford,Jensen.
Coal Size/Type: Rice,Buck,Pea,Nut&Stove
Other Heating: Oil HWBB

Re: VP debate

PostBy: baddawg On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:54 am

Biden was a ass. My dogs would show more respect to someone then he did. My dogs also have created more shovel ready jobs then they have. :idea: Rottweiler for President.
baddawg
 
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Leisure Line Pioneer

Re: VP debate

PostBy: whistlenut On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:00 am

Perfect!!!! Rotty for Pres! :D :D :D :D :D
whistlenut
 
Stoker Coal Boiler: AA130's,260's, AHS130&260's,EFM900,GJ&VanWert
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Franks Boiler,Itasca415,NYer130,Van Wert
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Yellow Flame
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: Alaska-4,Keystoker-2,
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Alaska,Gibraltor,Keystone,Vc Vigilant 2
Hand Fed Coal Furnace: Van Wert, NYer's, Ford,Jensen.
Coal Size/Type: Rice,Buck,Pea,Nut&Stove
Other Heating: Oil HWBB

Re: VP debate

PostBy: freetown fred On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:35 am

I'm in--Rot-eeeeee, Rot-eeeee :clap:
freetown fred
 
Hand Fed Coal Stove: HITZER 50-93
Coal Size/Type: BLASCHAK Nut/Stove mix

Re: VP debate

PostBy: baddawg On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:38 pm

If you elect me, I promise you where ever I am, there will be two shovel ready jobs per day, everyday. Some days I may create more, depending on what (who) I eat. Sadly I may not be the first bitch elected to office, but the first elected to the WH.
Attachments
IMG_0069.JPG
(149.75 KiB) Viewed 1 time
View: New PagePopup • Select:BBCode
[nepathumb]37056[/nepathumb]
baddawg
 
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Leisure Line Pioneer

Re: VP debate

PostBy: freetown fred On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:46 pm

How could anyone NOT vote for a face like that? :)
freetown fred
 
Hand Fed Coal Stove: HITZER 50-93
Coal Size/Type: BLASCHAK Nut/Stove mix

Re: VP debate

PostBy: VigIIPeaBurner On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:35 pm

Will somebody out there with the skill (HEY Mayor!) get permission to posterize this beautiful face in red, white and blue? You know, just like the famouse posters from 2008! :lol:
VigIIPeaBurner
 
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Keystoker Koker
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Vermont Casting Vigilant II 2310
Other Heating: #2 Oil Furnace

Re: VP debate

PostBy: EarthWindandFire On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:59 pm

I think Paul Volcko said more in his "debate" than the other two candidates!!
EarthWindandFire
 
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Leisure Line Lil' Heater.
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Hitzer model 75. (sold)
Other Heating: Oil Furnace and Kerosene Heaters.

Re: VP debate

PostBy: carlherrnstein On: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:24 pm

I was suprised at how Joe couldn't stop interupting Paul.
carlherrnstein
 
Hot Air Coal Stoker Stove: combustioneer model 77B
Coal Size/Type: pea stoker/Ohio bituminous