freetown fred wrote:Liability my friend, liabilityIt's what happens when a Country let's a bunch of lazy, sissy-ass lawyers dictate what you can & can't do. Yes, things were a lot different back when.
Rick 386 wrote:Well there is also just a little bit of difference in the type of power used back then.
As long as the water would not get into the firebox, they would run 'em..
How the hell do you do that now with a diesel engine turning a big ass electric motor ??? I don't think the high water would be too good for that motor do you ??
As I was going to pick up my lunch today, I was stopped at the tracks for an east bound 3 engine train pulling nothing but coal cars and they were full. The only time I have ever seen a load set up like that was on my Dad's "O" gauge layout. So somewhere on the east coast they must be needing it. Maybe it got washed away by Sandy or they were watching the waether forecast for the beginning of next week................
Rick
wsherrick wrote:
Even if we had steam locomotives today. They would not be running. It was the defiance of our Grandfathers and their sense of duty that kept things moving. I started on steam and I was exposed to the last of the steam era men. They were a different breed. If they had assessed the situation of my railroad today. The trains would be running, period. We would be running on train orders and timetable with qualified operators at each interlocking to report rear markers safely by. Now, they sit wringing their hands because the signals are dark.
By the way a modern diesel can not operate with more than 3 inches of water over the rail, but; that's not the point.
Rick 386 wrote:wsherrick wrote:
Even if we had steam locomotives today. They would not be running. It was the defiance of our Grandfathers and their sense of duty that kept things moving. I started on steam and I was exposed to the last of the steam era men. They were a different breed. If they had assessed the situation of my railroad today. The trains would be running, period. We would be running on train orders and timetable with qualified operators at each interlocking to report rear markers safely by. Now, they sit wringing their hands because the signals are dark.
By the way a modern diesel can not operate with more than 3 inches of water over the rail, but; that's not the point.
Not trying to downplay their work ethic or sense of responsibility one tiny bit.
Another thing to consider is without electric they cannot monitor the movenment of the trains without their little digital display and laptop, God forbid if someone had to manually keep track of where they were going..... I really don't think anyone has the mental capacity or wherewithal to do it today.
Rick
NoSmoke wrote:Considering the fact that these transit rail lines in New York City utilize electric third rail for motivation, flooding would be a huge concern I would think. I do not think it would really matter if Tropical Storm happened today, or 80 years ago back in the steam era, these lines were electrified even then and flooding would have prevented their use.
freetown fred wrote:Liability my friend, liabilityIt's what happens when a Country let's a bunch of lazy, sissy-ass lawyers dictate what you can & can't do. Yes, things were a lot different back when.
anthony7812 wrote:freetown fred wrote:Liability my friend, liabilityIt's what happens when a Country let's a bunch of lazy, sissy-ass lawyers dictate what you can & can't do. Yes, things were a lot different back when.
Gotta love the attitude of no matter what happens someone will be blamed. Hey *censored* happens no one wants *censored* to hit the fan but its not hollywood out thier, sometimes that ballsy decision actually doesnt work.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group