bigstick6017555 wrote:why try to see into the future? instead look at history past and i think you might get a better answer for these type of questions
lsayre wrote:bigstick6017555 wrote:why try to see into the future? instead look at history past and i think you might get a better answer for these type of questions
Because I don't believe the future will mirror the past. In the past there were plenty of tax paying hosts, and the burden placed upon them was bearable. In the future there will not be enough tax paying hosts, and (potentially) the burden placed upon them will be unbearable.

lsayre wrote:bigstick6017555 wrote:why try to see into the future? instead look at history past and i think you might get a better answer for these type of questions
Because I don't believe the future will mirror the past. In the past there were plenty of tax paying hosts, and the burden placed upon them was bearable. In the future there will not be enough tax paying hosts, and (potentially) the burden placed upon them will be unbearable.
jpete wrote:History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme!
lsayre wrote:jpete wrote:History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme!
For it to rhyme this time around that would require a majority of people to go back to having families with say 5 or more children.
lsayre wrote:jpete wrote:History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme!
For it to rhyme this time around that would require a majority of people to go back to having families with say 5 or more children.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group