They have some nerve trying to limit costs in a health care system whose costs have run wild.
SMITTY wrote:I take anything published in Huffpo with a grain of salt ...
It's probably not even close to the truth.
I have a friend who is a manager at Wal-mart. His insurance already sucks. He is the only one covered, his wife and 4 kids are not. If he wanted them to be covered, he would need to pay an additional $800 a month. So, Wal-mart helps us all out with their great prices, but then forces their employees to go on assitance and jacks up our taxes.
Tough to gross billions and not take care of your people.And they are not allowed to unionize either...
Rwalker wrote:So, Wal-mart helps us all out with their great prices, but then forces their employees to go on assitance and jacks up our taxes.
If your head isn't whipping side to side like your having a seizure, you'll get spoken to. If your on the phone for just a second, YOUR FIRED. Eating lunch while headed back to the shop? Reprimanded. 6 of one ... half dozen of the other ..... you can't win today. 
KLook wrote:I have a friend who is a manager at Wal-mart. His insurance already sucks. He is the only one covered, his wife and 4 kids are not. If he wanted them to be covered, he would need to pay an additional $800 a month. So, Wal-mart helps us all out with their great prices, but then forces their employees to go on assitance and jacks up our taxes.
Tough to gross billions and not take care of your people.And they are not allowed to unionize either...
And where would you shop if they unionized and had healthcare?? Oh, you mean take it out of profits? The classic plan, the company only exists for the benefit of the workers. Sounds like Russia used to be.
Kevin
I can't complain though. I have a union at my job, and benefits for my entire family at 1.5% of my pay every 2 weeks.
and then they moved to Mexico.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group