freetown fred wrote:Dave, my biggest fear is listening to that sissy ass, dumb SOB BLOOMERBERG down in NYC. It was just the times I guess back when, but I'm glad nothing I own is on the radar except my 9 mm
Rwalker wrote:Great post. Could not agree more about the role two parents play in a childs life. Gotta tell you though that I don't feel so good about the "Daddy's pow-pow on the night stand" aspect of your post. I am sure your children are like most in that while they know right from wrong, eventually the lure of that forbidden device will be too much to resist. The gun should be safely stored where kids cannot access it. That is the only kind of gun control I believe in. Well that and hitting your target.
Accidents happen when you hide your weapons from your children and they find them, not knowing what they are, and get excited and BAM, someone gets killed. My 8 year old has his own cricket .22.
As my best friend says, who is a sniper for the state police, a locked gun does you no good. The 3 criminals that just kicked your door in arent going to wait for you to unlock your weapon. Sorry, my .45 is always at the ready. All I have to do it pull the action back and squeeze the trigger 7 times. When I am out and carrying concealed, I carry with a live round in the chamber. You might have .01 seconds to react. That is enough time to pop the safety and squeeze the trigger.
My kids have been around guns and know the difference. I am confident when I lay down at night with my trusty .45 beside me that my kids will get no where near it. Even if they did, a 3 year old couldnt even come close to pulling the action back on my .45, taking off the safety, or pulling the trigger. My wife barely can.
You do what you do in your house, in my house, my go to weapon is at the ready.
I'm sorry (and no I don't know you personally ) but since you're spouting off about parenting and the virtues of virtual killing (at this time of year) yes maybe you are violent? You certainly profess to be quite capable of it? Look at your signature line! Your praying to the lord for the ability to kill someone! Come on, of all the things someone might actually pray for (and have it in a signature line for the world to see) that would be letting the world know what a bad ass you feel you are. Maybe it's paranoia that drives this but you put it out there that you're a cowboy who is unwilling to leave it to "The Professionals" and look to me like an accident waiting to happen.
There is nothing in the world you can say that will convince me that it's responsible parenting to give a .22 to an 8 year old and have unfettered access to weapons in your house. Your own words "I know they would never go near it" is unrealistic and naive. I truly hope that you never have to go through that pain and loss that could have been preventable. But again, as you stated to others, "that's on you".
I'm sure you are a great Dad and it sounds like you've got exceptional children. This is just where we differ and I only wish you are yours the best that life has to offer.
Obviously we all have to make our own decisions on how and where we store our guns. I'm a very firm believer in not storing them so that children can access them. And I don't mean hiding them, I mean securing them properly. With children in the house, I think anything less is irresponsible. This recent shooting and the colorado movie shooting were both carried out by someone who accessed guns that did not belong to them.
If I lived in a high crime area, or was a drug dealer, etc. my guns would probably be out on the night stand. Instead my .40 cal is in a hand gun safe in the top draw of the night stand. It is a push button type that I can open in the dark within about 3 seconds. I have practiced it many times without even looking at it. I've got two mouthy security systems that will alert me well before someone could be within 3 seconds of the bedroom.
I can't imagine how it would feel to know a child has shot himself or someone else accidentially with a gun that was left accessible.
Yanche wrote:Rwalker, what would you do differently if one of your children had some of the symptoms being attributed to the CT shooter, or a medically diagnosed mental disorder being treated with medication?
A source told the Connecticut Post that medications usually prescribed for mental illness were not found at the home.
Investigators are trying determine if Lanza was being treated for a medical or psychiatric ailment, and what, if anything, was prescribed, the source told the paper.
Lanza's parents had previously told poeple their son had Asperger's syndrome, a form of high-functioning autism, but it is unclear if he had ever been formally diagnosed.
jpete wrote:Yanche wrote:Rwalker, what would you do differently if one of your children had some of the symptoms being attributed to the CT shooter, or a medically diagnosed mental disorder being treated with medication?
Neither of which the shooter had but, please, continue...
Yanche wrote:jpete wrote:Yanche wrote:Rwalker, what would you do differently if one of your children had some of the symptoms being attributed to the CT shooter, or a medically diagnosed mental disorder being treated with medication?
Neither of which the shooter had but, please, continue...
I'll continue ... My question was specifically directed to Rwalker, who outlined how his family's history has a tradition of gun ownership, training and self reliance on having a gun close by for protection. Nothing wrong with that. That's his life experience. But, I asked what would he do differently if there was a child in his family with behavior characteristics so often identified after a horrible tragedy like this. The shooters in past tragedies that have that "look" or loner personalities. The ones we all say we "should have known". Knowing that just having a "look" or feeling about a person is not sufficient, I further qualified my question with a "medically diagnosed mental disorder". I'm just trying to understand what he would do differently if he had such a family situation. Clearly the outside threat he seeks to protect him and his family from would still be present. So what would he do differently with his guns?
SteveZee wrote:Neither of which the shooter had but, please, continue...
Northern Maine wrote:
Jpete...live by your own creed...
jpete wrote:Northern Maine wrote:
Jpete...live by your own creed...
Whose creed do you live by?
Northern Maine wrote:
A question unanswered leaves you wondering about the untold!
I'll continue ... My question was specifically directed to Rwalker, who outlined how his family's history has a tradition of gun ownership, training and self reliance on having a gun close by for protection. Nothing wrong with that. That's his life experience. But, I asked what would he do differently if there was a child in his family with behavior characteristics so often identified after a horrible tragedy like this. The shooters in past tragedies that have that "look" or loner personalities. The ones we all say we "should have known". Knowing that just having a "look" or feeling about a person is not sufficient, I further qualified my question with a "medically diagnosed mental disorder". I'm just trying to understand what he would do differently if he had such a family situation. Clearly the outside threat he seeks to protect him and his family from would still be present. So what would he do differently with his guns?
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group