The Champ

The Champ

PostBy: 009to090 On: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:20 pm

I guess this technology falls under "Hunting" :mrgreen:

http://www.boeing.com/Features/2012/10/ ... 22_12.html
User avatar
009to090
State of North Carolina Moderator
 
Posts: 4988
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Warrenton, NC
Stove/Furnace Make: Harman DVC500 x 2
Stove/Furnace Model: EFM 520 HighBoy


Re: The Champ

PostBy: Poconoeagle On: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:24 pm

wow
User avatar
Poconoeagle
State of Pennsylvania Moderator
 
Posts: 6792
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: Tobyhanna PA
Stove/Furnace Make: Buckwalter & Co. , EFM520
Stove/Furnace Model: No. 28 Glenwood 1880, Alaska

Re: The Champ

PostBy: Scottscoaled On: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:43 pm

Who would we use that weapon on??????? Ourselves????
Scottscoaled
Member
 
Posts: 1510
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Malta N.Y.
Stove/Furnace Make: Efm, ,
Stove/Furnace Model: 520x3 350 700

Re: The Champ

PostBy: Flyer5 On: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:49 am

Thats what happened to my desktop computer.Damn!
User avatar
Flyer5
Leisure Line Rep.
 
Posts: 2794
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Montrose PA
Stove/Furnace Make: Leisure Line Pioneer
Stove/Furnace Model: Burning Leisure Line WL110

Re: The Champ

PostBy: rubicondave33 On: Tue Dec 18, 2012 7:37 pm

I wonder how old the unclassified footage is. I haven't seen a CRT monitor in years! They did say that was from an earlier test.
User avatar
rubicondave33
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:02 am
Location: Indiana, PA
Stove/Furnace Make: efm
Stove/Furnace Model: DF520

Re: The Champ

PostBy: VigIIPeaBurner On: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:32 pm

Counter that with the second amendment ...?
User avatar
VigIIPeaBurner
State of New Jersey Moderator
 
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:49 am
Location: Pequest River Valley, Warren Co NJ
Stove/Furnace Make: Vermont Casting/Keystoker
Stove/Furnace Model: Vigilant II 2310/Koker

Re: The Champ

PostBy: Yanche On: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:20 pm

The weapon capabilities illustrated in the test would be useless against military targets, especially ones with no electronics fire and control systems. The principle of the weapon is to create such a large electromagnetic force field that it overwhelms the normal functionality in the opponents weapon system electronics. It's one thing to overwhelm ordinary commonplace electronics, but military designed hardware is different. Ideally such military hardware is designed to meet MIL spec 461, Electromagnetic Compatibility. I know I've designed and tested hardware that meets the spec. To knock it out with a weapon would require a huge field which implies a very huge power source. It's just not practical. For spacecraft it's a bit different, you can get a large enough field with a nuclear explosion in space. That's why most military and some civilian spacecraft are designed with radiation hardened electronic parts. I know I've done it. Such a design requirement severely limits the part selection, because there aren't that many to choose from.

So what you see is nothing more than Boeing marketing, the physics obstacles are much to great for a practical weapon.
User avatar
Yanche
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 1:45 pm
Location: Sykesville, Maryland
Stove/Furnace Make: Alternate Heating Systems, Inc
Stove/Furnace Model: S-130 Boiler burning pea coal