How the Newtown massacre became a Mind-Control event

How the Newtown massacre became a Mind-Control television event

by Jon Rappoport

December 18, 2012

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012 ... ion-event/


Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Sounds like the idiot who wrote that would have rather it never been reported. It shows that his particular outlook has no room for the suffering that took place for those folks. I can understand why nobody in your circle responded to you posting this piece of crap.

There's that strange sound again. Anyone else hear it. Its different this time.

Flyer5 wrote:There's that strange sound again. Anyone else hear it. Its different this time.

What sound with that be?

inhotwater wrote:Sounds like the idiot who wrote that would have rather it never been reported. It shows that his particular outlook has no room for the suffering that took place for those folks. I can understand why nobody in your circle responded to you posting this piece of crap.

Guess you just did not understand, John is one of the very few Journalist I have any respect for.. and BTW I post many things, just because I post it does not mean I subscribe to it.

inhotwater wrote:Sounds like the idiot who wrote that would have rather it never been reported. It shows that his particular outlook has no room for the suffering that took place for those folks. I can understand why nobody in your circle responded to you posting this piece of crap.

The subject essay was not about the shooting, it was about the reporting of that shooting.

Don't you think he raised some good points?

franco b wrote:

inhotwater wrote:Sounds like the idiot who wrote that would have rather it never been reported. It shows that his particular outlook has no room for the suffering that took place for those folks. I can understand why nobody in your circle responded to you posting this piece of crap.

The subject essay was not about the shooting, it was about the reporting of that shooting.

Don't you think he raised some good points?

Thank you..

I think the reporting stunk, they couldn't get any of the facts right. After changing stories so many times people start to wonder what the truth really is, and how it happened. I thought I heard a noise to. Nice piece "Grumpy"

grumpy wrote:

franco b wrote:

inhotwater wrote:Sounds like the idiot who wrote that would have rather it never been reported. It shows that his particular outlook has no room for the suffering that took place for those folks. I can understand why nobody in your circle responded to you posting this piece of crap.

The subject essay was not about the shooting, it was about the reporting of that shooting.

Don't you think he raised some good points?

Thank you..

I'll respond to you. You seem like you give some thought to your responses. I do understand that it was not about the shooting. However, I am conditioned to be annoyed with these guys that are always claiming that the liberal media is trying to program the public and create mass paranoia to gain support for a particular issue or set of ideals. I have family members who are always looking under the bed to see if the liberal boogie man is hiding there. I could Make the same claims about the so called conservative media outlets on a variety of subjects. Believe it or not, I'm not a liberal as the noses of your friends are detecting. I burn coal, I own guns, I'm not a proponent of abortion, gay marriage and the list goes on. I do shy away from a narrow partisan mindset. If that makes me a liberal to some, I guess there's nothing I can do about that.

inhotwater wrote: Believe it or not, I'm not a liberal as the noses of your friends are detecting. I burn coal, I own guns, I'm not a proponent of abortion, gay marriage and the list goes on. I do shy away from a narrow partisan mindset. If that makes me a liberal to some, I guess there's nothing I can do about that.

Heheh, no. It's just after 17 posts it's obvious you just like to inflame the discussion and already have a reputation as such. No reason to whine about it.

inhotwater wrote:I do shy away from a narrow partisan mindset.

Even though it makes me a bit nervous to know you have guns I am happy that you embrace some conservative positions.

Unlike you I do have a narrow partisan mindset concerning the well being of the individual as opposed to the collective. This is the opposite of Liberal thought which I believe if allowed to run its course will destroy both.

Sorry I can't agree with your position that there is only one absolute truth in a view of partisan politics. For instance, I am a long time Union activist. I can't embrace the conservative view on trade Unionism. Not because the labor movement tells me I can't. But rather because history does. Conserative voting records tell the tail. I find nearly no one in the republican party who wil support labor issues. In fact, almost all legislation aimed at weakening the voice of working Americans is introduced by Republicans. That affects the way I look at things.

inhotwater wrote:Sorry I can't agree with your position that there is only one absolute truth in a view of partisan politics. For instance, I am a long time Union activist. I can't embrace the conservative view on trade Unionism. Not because the labor movement tells me I can't. But rather because history does. Conserative voting records tell the tail. I find nearly no one in the republican party who wil support labor issues. In fact, almost all legislation aimed at weakening the voice of working Americans is introduced by Republicans. That affects the way I look at things.

Monopoly by either side is bad. In the past, market forces often gave employers no choice but to impose inhuman labor conditions in order to survive. It wasn't always greed. Unions, by imposing a more level playing field on employers often benefited both. A voice speaking up for labor was also a good thing. However unions can be just as nasty as employers as i am sure you are aware of the many instances of featherbedding and the squeezing of employers to the point of bankruptcy.

Conservatives hold that the rights of an individual take precedence over anything else. Naturally this conflicts with any collective movement whether by labor or government.

Government employee unions are pure evil as they are not subject to market forces as private sector unions are. They are consumers of wealth rather than producers.

Guy with 18 posts comes in to the Forum Help Desk & Feedback forum for his first post whining about us conservatives .... then proceeds to turn the Help Desk into a political rant .... THEN starts running his mouth in the political forum. Typical.



There is no question the LIBERAL LEFT WING media has an AGENDA. They purposely misconstrue the facts regarding types firearms so as to further the government's agenda of banning and/or restricting "scary black guns". Not based on any fact, of course, but based solely on liberal emotion ... "Because the AR-15 LOOKS like a "military" weapon." Any moron can see right through this.

franco b, your last couple of posts have been right on the money