gun owner map

I would love to see someone did up P Morgans CHL, it would not surprise me if he had one..

They are adding to the map http://news.yahoo.com/york-newspaper-li ... nance.html

homecomfort wrote:I thought the whole idea of owning a gun, or guns, was to brag about it, ya know, " I am a gun totin' angry scared sob, and if ya mess wit me, I gonna shoot yoo butt, and there ain't no secret 'bout dat".

No, that's YOUR wet dream. You're just too scared to pull the trigger(pardon the pun) and arm yourself. The rest of us just want to live our lives in relative obscurity and protect ourselves and those around us if the need arises.

jpete wrote:

homecomfort wrote:I thought the whole idea of owning a gun, or guns, was to brag about it, ya know, " I am a gun totin' angry scared sob, and if ya mess wit me, I gonna shoot yoo butt, and there ain't no secret 'bout dat".

No, that's YOUR wet dream. You're just too scared to pull the trigger(pardon the pun) and arm yourself. The rest of us just want to live our lives in relative obscurity and protect ourselves and those around us if the need arises.

Never ceases to amaze me how liberals really do believe in Hollywood as reality.

Public information or not. And it should not be public or even required to register a firearm, This is exactly why. The unarmed people are at a huge disadvantage. I bet a lot of them are 2nd guessing there decision to not own. This should be a invasion of privacy issue.

No doubt their will be lawsuits from this as soon as any "damages" occur, "damages" could be anything from someones reputation being harmed to someone braking into their home. Im not sure how this could even be fixed or remedied at this point.

Richard S. wrote:The newspaper broke no law so I'm not sure what they would be sued for, NY currently has legislation that would prevent this information from being public but that doesn't help the people who have already had their names published.

no law has to be broke for people to sue for damages in civil court... I think a jury of peers would be very unfavorable toward whatever department released the info as well as the newspaper which published it.

P.S. Rich, you must be an insomniac (like me) LOL .

They already do this to farmers.

If you receive any monies for anything on your farm; whether it be for corn subsidies or just putting in a ditch to prevent soil erosion, an anti-farming liberal group places you on a list located online by state and county of what farms got how much money and in what year. Of course they do not state WHY you got the money; just place that scarlet letter on you and your farm as a way to shame you.

I have no problem with this...if you take the money you should be accountable to it, BUT that should apply to welfare recipients as well. I think we would be shocked at our friends and neighbors who are on the government dole. I just do not think it is right that we apply a electronic scarlet letter on farmers and gun owners.

BTW: If this were to go into affect, I wonder how many Occupy-(insert name of city here) protesters would have been shown to be hypocrites?

plumb-r wrote:So what wins out when privacy laws and FOI laws clash. The answer is which ever law supports the liberal view at that time . With the internet someone should start a campaign and run that rag into the ground. Why doesn't someone publish a list of people collecting SSI, food stamps and unemployment. That will really shake things up!

The current plan per the Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... print.html

As opposed to the rhetoric during the campaign for 2008:

http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-wi ... -guns-away

NoSmoke wrote:They already do this to farmers.

If you receive any monies for anything on your farm; whether it be for corn subsidies or just putting in a ditch to prevent soil erosion, an anti-farming liberal group places you on a list located online by state and county of what farms got how much money and in what year. Of course they do not state WHY you got the money; just place that scarlet letter on you and your farm as a way to shame you.

I have no problem with this...if you take the money you should be accountable to it, BUT that should apply to welfare recipients as well. I think we would be shocked at our friends and neighbors who are on the government dole. I just do not think it is right that we apply a electronic scarlet letter on farmers and gun owners.

BTW: If this were to go into affect, I wonder how many Occupy-(insert name of city here) protesters would have been shown to be hypocrites?

plumb-r wrote:So what wins out when privacy laws and FOI laws clash. The answer is which ever law supports the liberal view at that time . With the internet someone should start a campaign and run that rag into the ground. Why doesn't someone publish a list of people collecting SSI, food stamps and unemployment. That will really shake things up!

I think your totally right, I think its only fair to know people on welfare. ssdi, unemployment, foodstamps, housing vouchers, etc. (after all, we pay for it!) where do we find these lists???

dcrane wrote:

NoSmoke wrote:They already do this to farmers.

If you receive any monies for anything on your farm; whether it be for corn subsidies or just putting in a ditch to prevent soil erosion, an anti-farming liberal group places you on a list located online by state and county of what farms got how much money and in what year. Of course they do not state WHY you got the money; just place that scarlet letter on you and your farm as a way to shame you.

I have no problem with this...if you take the money you should be accountable to it, BUT that should apply to welfare recipients as well. I think we would be shocked at our friends and neighbors who are on the government dole. I just do not think it is right that we apply a electronic scarlet letter on farmers and gun owners.

BTW: If this were to go into affect, I wonder how many Occupy-(insert name of city here) protesters would have been shown to be hypocrites?

plumb-r wrote:So what wins out when privacy laws and FOI laws clash. The answer is which ever law supports the liberal view at that time . With the internet someone should start a campaign and run that rag into the ground. Why doesn't someone publish a list of people collecting SSI, food stamps and unemployment. That will really shake things up!

I think your totally right, I think its only fair to know people on welfare. ssdi, unemployment, foodstamps, housing vouchers, etc. (after all, we pay for it!) where do we find these lists???

I would think that would or should be public record. I am not sure, we just need the media to ask for it the same way. But I am not sure they are the true enemy per say. Its the officials that let it be corrupted.