titleist1 wrote:Not that I can avoid it,
Richard S. wrote:titleist1 wrote:Not that I can avoid it,
Sure you can, get a machine with 7.
Let them work the issues out with 8 and buy 9. You're on the wrong OS timeline. LOL
titleist1 wrote:Richard S. wrote:titleist1 wrote:Not that I can avoid it,
Sure you can, get a machine with 7.
Let them work the issues out with 8 and buy 9. You're on the wrong OS timeline. LOL
So I just gotta stay on the odd numbered OS's?!![]()
titleist1 wrote:
So I just gotta stay on the odd numbered OS's?!
dcrane wrote:I still think XP was one of the most flawless OS they made, the problem is that you WILL BE forced eventually to upgrade whether you want to or not for compatibility issues and the forced retail sales market. I suggest if your buying a new computer that you buy as updated as possible (yes that includes the OS), however if your simply talking about upgrading an existing machine i would not do it.
SteveZee wrote:That's true, eventually you will have to upgrade when they stop supporting the existing OS. But that said, one usually upgrades the hardware before that happens so it becomes moot.
Richard S. wrote:SteveZee wrote:That's true, eventually you will have to upgrade when they stop supporting the existing OS. But that said, one usually upgrades the hardware before that happens so it becomes moot.
I try and catch the wave just after the crest so I'm not paying out the ass although I went a little overboard with this last one. My 95 machine had 56K, my XP machine had SATA in 2003. My newest machine has USB3, SATA3 and SSD that is SATA3.... I'll probably won't be buying a new machine until the Windows 9 is in it's last months.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group