List of EO by Barry

KLook wrote:

I'm assuming that patients would be those with mental problems. Severely depressed as an example.

No, they have the ability now to grill your kids without you present and document what you have in your house. This is why they were barred from doing it. Use the children to undermine the parents. Popular theme with Socialist/Marxist/whatever. There were big fights in online forums about the doctors being barred from doing it. Of course, the mostly female doctors arguing would say that they just wanted to "study" the links, but it would finally come out that they were anti-gun. Funny pro-gun doctors don't see the need to gather info that can be modified by the collectors at will. Not a scientific study unless controls are in place and we have seen the Liberal penchant for lying to achieve ends. Just look at the global warming fiasco.

Kevin

carlherrnstein wrote:I hate to continue to lead this calf astray, but.... I was also asked by my occupational physician during a exam if a owned/used firearms. I asked her why she wanted to know she said it was to figure out if i have or could develop hearing loss from non-occupational exposure to loud noises. I said I will not awnser her question but asked her to ask the question in a different way. She did and i gave her a awnser. She also asked if i cast bullets or worked with lead solder.

Richard S. wrote:I don't see anything here that I have any concerns about at the moment.

SteveZee wrote:"I don't have a problem with most of those. Numbers 4, 14, 15 & 16 need alittle work.

I would add that anyone taking a SSRI (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) should not own a gun. The majority of these mass shooters are young men who were prescribed these drugs. The most common are Prozac, Celexa, Luvox, Zoloft, Paxil and Lexapro. SSRI's are the "smoking gun" that the politicans and doctors don't want to talk about. There are more and some variants but normal sane people don't go into a school and slaughter scores of people. People who are unstable do."

That's kinds what I thought Kirk, that it was something like that before they should be asking.

jpete wrote:Other than the executive branch once again usurping the legislative branch. I guess that genie is long out of the bottle...

Black_And_Blue wrote:So, executive order or executive 'action', as I understood, it appears to be Presidential suggestions to congress.......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order
To date, U.S. courts have overturned only two executive orders: the aforementioned Truman order, and a 1995 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the federal government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll.[9] Congress was able to overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it during the period of 1939 to 1983 until the Supreme Court ruled in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha that the "legislative veto" represented "the exercise of legislative power" without "bicameral passage followed by presentment to the President."[10] The loss of the legislative veto has caused Congress to look for alternative measures to override executive orders such as refusing to approve funding necessary to carry out certain policy measures contained with the order or to legitimize policy mechanisms. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order. It has been argued that a Congressional override of an executive order is a nearly impossible event due to the supermajority vote required and the fact that such a vote leaves individual lawmakers very vulnerable to political criticism.[11]

lsayre wrote:Pertinent to #2 on the list:

What form of health issues might disqualify you from gun ownership.