samhill wrote: If you need a 100 round mag go for it, personally I haven't yet & don't believe I ever will.
samhill wrote:Once again & still yet Jpete your right as usual, being there you know all about everything but I guess you must have signed on the second page that was lost. I bow to you, a truly great ?. I have held a person at gunpoint in defense of someone else & thankfully that turned out OK. How about you Jpete, have you even done anything positive for anyone or anything but yourself, have you ever served, have you ever given rather than take, have you ever done anything except for you or your delusional thoughts about the evil hoards from either side coming to get you? What exactly makes you so all knowing & important that this Gov. even knows how you are yet alone have a vendetta against you? Or is it you simply like to throw your two cents in & change the subject? Just what does what I have done have to do with a choice of self defense weapon?
samhill wrote:Jpete, what I said about the 100round mag is that if you feel you need one then go for it. That was in the scope of the subject IMO, what my personal history with guns has nothing to do with it. You brought in your disgust & mistrust of an out of control Gov. & your need for something to stop them good luck with that one. As I asked from you several questions that you didn't answer then I guess I was correct with you just wanting to change the subject & bring in your hate for Gov.. I recall in another thread about your assessment of all Gov. employees as being a very high % brainless but by your own admission you are or at least were one of those, collecting Gov. money & educational help from a Gov. you hate is OK but I think that would qualify you as on the Gov. payroll. Don't get me wrong with bringing that up, I would do the same except I wouldn't badmouth & bite the hand that feeds me, I may not be book smart & worldly like you claim to be but I do have common sense.
samhill wrote:Jpete, I think that Biden's & my own opinions are just as much our right as yours, that's where we differ I never said any more than it is a logical means of self defense but yourself & other self righteous defenders of the Constitution & Bill of Rights proceed to say that we have no right to voice said opinions. Just where in there does it say you or anyone else has a right to a certain arm? Where does that right start or stop if not with a well regulated militia being necessary? That first part of the second is always overlooked for some reason, maybe because if you exclude that then you can easily throw in your own meaning & ignore the actual text.