ana Christensen, associate lab director for energy and engineering at ORNL, says that health risks from radiation in coal by-products are low. "Other risks like being hit by lightning," he adds, "are three or four times greater than radiation-induced health effects from coal plants." And McBride and his co-authors emphasize that other products of coal power, like emissions of acid rain–producing sulfur dioxide and smog-forming nitrous oxide, pose greater health risks than radiation.
e.alleg wrote:I would say that one McDonald's meal will shorten your life more than a year worth of dumping the ash pan will.

Yanche wrote:You are comparing apples to oranges. The fly ash in the referenced links are all from bituminous coal burning electric power plants. Most of us are burning Anthracite coal. Power plants have huge boilers with automated control systems and burn characteristics much different than our low temperature stoves, furnaces and boilers. You can not assume the ash produced by both are the same. I know of no data on the hazards of fly ash created by Anthracite residential coal burning.
That said I do use a cartridge type respirator when loading coal or emptying ashes. I like to error on the side of caution.
spc wrote:I would like to see a study that shows anthracite coal burning fly ash is radioactive.
coaledsweat wrote:It has about the same radioactivity as the concrete or bricks in your home IIRC.
Berlin wrote:"Are you assuming that the bricks or concrete were made with fly ash as one of the ingredients?"
no! it doesn't have to be, when's the last time you researched the radioactivity of common household building materials, dirt or miscilaneous items?? i suggest you do it so as not to scare yourself and everyone else about the mythological dangers of coalash.![]()
btw, when's the last time you checked your house for radon??
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group