sauerzbr wrote:Checked the stove this morning. I had set the temp set to 70 degrees overnight. Thermo read 70 degrees and the fans felt like they were running full blast. When the room is at set temp for a long period of time, is it normal for the fans to be on what seems to be a high speed? It was blowing nothing but cool air, didn't really feel any warmth to it.
sauerzbr wrote:Did some more testing with holding the thermostat in front of the stove and after a good period of time, the stove blowers did slow down. Thermo was reading in the 90's for a long time before those blower even slowed a bit
pvolcko wrote:WNY, The TS2 has only automatic fan speed control. TS1 thermostats have both automatic and manual fan speed control.
Coalstoves, the sections that you quote demonstrate that sauerzbr's control is working as designed. After putting the thermo in the hot air stream (it was reading 90 degrees, a 20 degree jump above setpoint) and forcing the feedrate to more or less jump to 0, the fans started to slow down and eventually stop. It took a while for this slow down and stop to happen because of that delay in the automatic fan speed control logic I spoke of. Normally, when FR is allowed to change based on slow room temperature changes the fan speed delay is not a factor. However, when FR changes fast or in a jump, the fan speed will be slow to react to the change in FR. This is by design and has been in place since the very first Coal-trol was sold. The delay is there because it takes a while for the fuel already on the grate to burn off and to bleed off all the stored heat in the body of the stove, at least for negative jumps in FR. For positive jumps the delay is also there, the idea being that it takes a while for the fuel to get fed onto the grate and start burning fully and to heat up the body of the stove.
Also, we do recognize that some people would like adjustments added to make fan speeds be slower in the low to medium feedrate range (we do listen, really we do), in order to reduce noise or increase outlet air temperature. This is a feature included in our next version of the thermostat software; there is an adjustable setting to control at what FR the fan first starts, higher settings increase outlet air temp. Unfortunately, we do not yet know when the new version will be released to the public (it's undergoing final testing now), but as we've offered in the past, if people want to update their thermostats to this new software it can be done for a moderate fee. The fee for the update to this new version has not been set yet.
pvolcko wrote:Coalstoves, the sections that you quote demonstrate that sauerzbr's control is working as designed. It took a while for this slow down and stop to happen because of that delay in the automatic fan speed control logic I spoke of. Normally, when FR is allowed to change based on slow room temperature changes the fan speed delay is not a factor. However, when FR changes fast or in a jump, the fan speed will be slow to react to the change in FR. This is by design and has been in place since the very first Coal-trol was sold. The delay is there because it takes a while for the fuel already on the grate to burn off and to bleed off all the stored heat in the body of the stove, at least for negative jumps in FR. For positive jumps the delay is also there, the idea being that it takes a while for the fuel to get fed onto the grate and start burning fully and to heat up the body of the stove.
coalstoves wrote: Not to be mean spirited but a Big Thumbs Down on this one .
coalstoves wrote:pvolcko wrote:
I'm not saying anymore on the subject other than I find the situations sauerzbr describes as unacceptable performance, if blowing cold air around the room is par for the course I would be very very unhappy with my stove .
I still don't think something is right though because nobody else has had a complaint like that here and it is indeed a point to complain about, in my opinion bad enough to warrant returning the stove but I guess that’s just me .
I hope you guys can get this straightened out, if asked in the future about the Pro's and Con's of the LL CT combination I would point them to this thread as something to consider before deciding .
Not to be mean spirited but a Big Thumbs Down on this one .
nwaelder wrote:coalstoves wrote:pvolcko wrote:
I'm not saying anymore on the subject other than I find the situations sauerzbr describes as unacceptable performance, if blowing cold air around the room is par for the course I would be very very unhappy with my stove .
I still don't think something is right though because nobody else has had a complaint like that here and it is indeed a point to complain about, in my opinion bad enough to warrant returning the stove but I guess that’s just me .
I hope you guys can get this straightened out, if asked in the future about the Pro's and Con's of the LL CT combination I would point them to this thread as something to consider before deciding .
Not to be mean spirited but a Big Thumbs Down on this one .
Well... well... Coalstoves has weighed in with his "most valuable" opinion.
As an anonymous keyboard warrior your soapbox is as big as anyone else's.
However your credibility is zero.
Now Coalstoves, you "... find the situations sauerzbr describes as unacceptable performance..." YES
Are you a customer of LL or AC?... No! I Chose the Harman
I see you claim to have a Harman and Liberty. ...That is correct
Why don't you tell us a bit about yourself and all your expertise... What would you like to Know
My apologies in advance for presuming to lecture the good members of the forum. ...Accepted
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group