Blaschak Vs. Reading Rice Coal

 
Grinder
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri. Dec. 07, 2007 8:00 pm

Post by Grinder » Wed. Jan. 02, 2008 6:19 pm

Our first ton of the season (Blaschak) is almost gone. We ordered our next ton from a different supplier, which carries Reading. Just wondering how the two compare? The bag of Reading that I opened didn't look as consistent in size as the Blaschak.


 
bksaun
Member
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sat. Oct. 28, 2006 9:24 am
Location: Hustonville, Ky
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Legacy SF-270
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Hitzer 503
Coal Size/Type: Stoker/Bit, Pea or Nut Anthracite

Post by bksaun » Wed. Jan. 02, 2008 6:46 pm

It's not, but it still burn's.

BK

 
Grinder
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri. Dec. 07, 2007 8:00 pm

Post by Grinder » Wed. Jan. 02, 2008 9:31 pm

There are some pretty good sized nuggets in there. I worry about it jamming the stoker.

 
bksaun
Member
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sat. Oct. 28, 2006 9:24 am
Location: Hustonville, Ky
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Legacy SF-270
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Hitzer 503
Coal Size/Type: Stoker/Bit, Pea or Nut Anthracite

Post by bksaun » Wed. Jan. 02, 2008 10:04 pm

I burned 3 tons of Reading last year and noticed some pieces the size of pea or nut coal, not many, I never had a jam. I am running an Alaska Channing III.

I saved some of the big pieces and put them in my sister in laws Christmas stocking. The rest burned up without a problem.

This year I am burning Blashak and have seen no big pieces, it is more uniform in size.

BK

 
gregolma
Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Wed. Dec. 19, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Buffalo, NY

Post by gregolma » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 12:48 am

Reading is better.

 
User avatar
LsFarm
Member
Posts: 7383
Joined: Sun. Nov. 20, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Michigan
Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 260
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Self-built 'Big Bertha' SS Boiler
Baseburners & Antiques: Keystone 11, Art Garland

Post by LsFarm » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 3:38 am

Buy a piece of 1/2" 'hardware cloth' mesh screen, and dump the rice through the screen. You don't want a hunk the size of nut or pea coal getting into and jamming the stoker mechanism.

Greg L

 
sauerzbr
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri. Dec. 07, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: Cherryville, PA

Post by sauerzbr » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 7:11 am

I'm burning reading without any issues.


 
User avatar
noknokman
New Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed. Dec. 05, 2007 11:35 pm
Location: Wingdale, NY

Post by noknokman » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 1:35 pm

I bought 20 bags of Reading last week. So far I'm not impressed. Sizing is far less uniform than Blaschak and it's so wet that it's freezing in the bags outside. I won't be buying it again; glad I didn't get a ton.

 
Grinder
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri. Dec. 07, 2007 8:00 pm

Post by Grinder » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 5:13 pm

gregolma wrote:Reading is better.
What do you like better about Reading?
noknokman wrote:I bought 20 bags of Reading last week. So far I'm not impressed. Sizing is far less uniform than Blaschak and it's so wet that it's freezing in the bags outside. I won't be buying it again; glad I didn't get a ton.
I too noticed that it seemed very wet. It would be interesting to know how much water weight we're paying for.

 
User avatar
av8r
Member
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu. Dec. 06, 2007 12:07 pm
Location: Near Owego, NY
Hot Air Coal Stoker Furnace: Leisure Line Hearth with twin turbos (sounds like it)

Post by av8r » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 6:41 pm

Grinder wrote:
gregolma wrote:Reading is better.
What do you like better about Reading?
noknokman wrote:I bought 20 bags of Reading last week. So far I'm not impressed. Sizing is far less uniform than Blaschak and it's so wet that it's freezing in the bags outside. I won't be buying it again; glad I didn't get a ton.
I too noticed that it seemed very wet. It would be interesting to know how much water weight we're paying for.
One of the local dealers here allows 3% for water. You get 103 pounds in a 100 pound bag. Maybe they all do that...I dunno

 
User avatar
coalstoves
Member
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri. Feb. 23, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Mt.Carmel Pa. Located on The Western Middle Anthracite Field

Post by coalstoves » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 6:58 pm

It goes without saying I am a Big Blaschak Fan, but I am developing some room in my bin and have been thinking about picking up a half a ton of Reading for a test burn it is only a couple miles difference in the drive with Reading being closer Blaschak has been pulling a lot of red ash coal out of the Lykens vein near Centralia to blend and the ash this year has bee more tan to red than the white I prefer , I know Reading is pulling huge amounts of coal from all along the Mammoth Vein might be time to see how it does . My Victory 700 despises Red Ash Coal and so far the current Blaschak Blend hasn't been a problem but its always good to know whats available and how it performs.
I often wonder if some of the problems the LS has with his AA could be avoided by using a good quality white ash coal

 
User avatar
LsFarm
Member
Posts: 7383
Joined: Sun. Nov. 20, 2005 8:02 pm
Location: Michigan
Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 260
Hand Fed Coal Boiler: Self-built 'Big Bertha' SS Boiler
Baseburners & Antiques: Keystone 11, Art Garland

Post by LsFarm » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 7:11 pm

The Blaschak coal I burn as a hand-feeder burnt to a fine white ash. Almost like talcum powder. This is what my UAE coal does, it burns to a fine sand-like powder with no chunky ash, And the AA likes chunky ash or the powdery or sandy ash packs on my grate.

So far the powder/packing/constipation with my AA boiler has been eliminated with the coal from the Hegins breaker. It leaves a redish chunky ash, and the coal bed/ash bed is staying open, not clogging with powder, the fire temps are staying hot, because of plenty of air to the fire.

The reading coal I burnt as a hand feeder was not so good. I bought 5 tons of stove and nut two seasons ago. I had lots of clinker formation in my firebox. I had to let the fire go out every two weeks or so, and clean out the clinker and hard ash. The stove size coal left behind large hard white chunks of coal that were burnt all the way through, but wouldn't break up with my grate shaking motion. So this built up till it clinkered or blocked the airflow to the fire...

Makes me think that I should try some reading Pea coal in my AA boiler, the hard ash is what the AA likes... Naw, I like the Hegins coal, nice clean coal, no wood chips or rock. The reading had lots of wood, and odd sizes of coal.

Greg L

 
User avatar
e.alleg
Member
Posts: 1285
Joined: Fri. Feb. 16, 2007 10:31 am
Location: western ny

Post by e.alleg » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 9:44 pm

I have been burning reading rice coal, the load I got in the late summer is uniform in size and no dirt/wood/rocks/metal to speak of. I got another deliver from the same dealer in November and that was all over the board. Some bags look like pea coal, other bags look like ready mix concrete with stones mixed in. It all burns, the bags with the large chinks also contain nails, screws. cotter pins, wood, and plain old rocks. What I've been doing is picking out the huge pieces, it all burns hot so no complaints there.

 
User avatar
CoalHeat
Member
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat. Feb. 10, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Stillwater, New Jersey
Stoker Coal Boiler: 1959 EFM 350
Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harman Magnafire Mark I
Baseburners & Antiques: Sears Signal Oak 15 & Andes Kitchen Range
Coal Size/Type: Rice and Chestnut
Other Heating: Fisher Fireplace Insert

Post by CoalHeat » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 10:05 pm

e.alleg wrote:Some bags look like pea coal, other bags look like ready mix concrete with stones mixed in. It all burns, the bags with the large chinks also contain nails, screws. cotter pins, wood, and plain old rocks. What I've been doing is picking out the huge pieces, it all burns hot so no complaints there.
Was this Reading in the 40 lb. heat sealed plastic bags or was it coal bagged by the dealer at their yard? I can't believe someone would sell bagged coal with all that junk in it. Every time I've gotten bagged coal the most I'll find is some wood, a stone once in a while, or a little piece of slate.

Of the big names in (strip) coal I liked Blaschak the best, very uniform size.

The quality of the coal from the big strip mine companies varies constantly, depending on where they are pulling it from and what they are blending it with.

 
mikeandgerry
Member
Posts: 1894
Joined: Sat. Jul. 29, 2006 8:19 pm
Location: North Norwich, NY
Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman-Anderson Anthratube 130-M

Post by mikeandgerry » Thu. Jan. 03, 2008 10:32 pm

LsFarm wrote:Makes me think that I should try some reading Pea coal in my AA boiler, the hard ash is what the AA likes... Naw, I like the Hegins coal, nice clean coal, no wood chips or rock. The reading had lots of wood, and odd sizes of coal.

Greg L
What sizes of coal have you been burning in the AA260m?


Post Reply

Return to “Stoker Coal Furnaces & Stoves Using Anthracite (Hot Air)”