The one and only video of the 'plane' hitting the Pentagon showed whatever it was [not a 757, I'll explain] was traveling virtually parallel to the ground just below the vision of the parking lot camera's view.. what is seen is NOT the tail of any commercial jet aircraft.
Fact: all the surveillance video from all the surrounding stores, parking lots etc were confiscated immediately after the 'crash'. wonder why??
If an airliner is typical, ie: not the Concorde, it will fly at roughly 500-580 mph TRUE AIRSPEED at Cruising Altitude..
This same typical airplane has an indicated 'red line' or maximum indicated airspeed at sea level somewhere around 350 to 390mph.
But the plane could not achieve this at 1' or 5' of altitude, there is a 'ground effect' which makes the air denser, and act a bit like water, creating a wave in front of a fast moving object.. it is a fact and an effect every pilot experiences when landing, It would be virtually impossible to fly level to the ground, in 'clean' or cruise configuration at only a few feet above the surface.
If an airplane is 'forced' to exceed it's redline max speed, the flight controls flutter, depart the plane, pieces fall off, and the plane is uncontrollable. So you cannot 'force' a plane with full power to exceed it's design limits, it will come apart.
There has never been, except for the Pentagon 'plane crash' an airplane striking the ground at near level flight and not having tons of large debris all over the place.. There are NO engines, pieces of tail section, landing gear, wheels, tires etc in any of the remaining photos or video of the post 'crash' fire.
And yet another oddity: an airplane is an amazingly fragile piece of aluminum tube, it does not have the mass to punch a hole through several reinforced concrete walls. The engines might, but if you can find some of the early photos of the 'crash' and fire, you will see only the one central hole, not one bit of side-damage from either engine, and they are much more capable of punching a hole through reinforced concrete. No pieces of the tail, which almost always survives to some extent.
The aerodynamics of the supposed 'crash' don't work, the physics don't work, the 'missing' aka confiscated video from many other and better angles of the arriving 'plane' are not around to support or refute 'the story'.. funny, why not make a few of the other video files available, if, and a BIG IF, they show a 757 arriving on the pentagon lawn ??
It all stinks.. the whole 911 deal stinks..
You believers in 'the story' of 911 ought to think about this: remember TWA 800? the 747 that supposedly blew up in midair because of a spark or two from a bad fuel pump?? [that's another BS story]
There was a huge, maybe the largest ever recovery effort ever, to find and retrieve every part of that plane from the ocean floor.. the FAA, and NTSB and a whole lot of other agencies have about 98% of the plane, in a warehouse near New York, it is all put back 'together' each piece fastened to a framework next to it's matching torn or shattered edge of the next piece..
All of this was done to find out WHAT REALLY happened to the plane.
That assembly of shattered 747 airplane pieces is STILL in the Warehouse.. OK a huge effort to figure out what caused the accident..
OK so now, with the Twin Towers.. where is the steel?? Where are the samples of the 'heat damaged' steel that supposedly sagged and cause the towers to do a PERFECT implosion and fall into their own basements ?? Where are the distorted pieces, the sheared rivets, the molecular analysis of the steel? Hell they did an analysis of the steel rivets in the Titanic, looking for fault.. why not in the Twin Towers??
The steel was removed and immediatly sold as scrap to overseas buyers, The steel taken away and hidden, guarded from the public and the media. Nobody ever investigated the properties of the steel, the structure, the joints, etc.. it was hush-hushed and sent away as fast as it could be done..
A large group of building engineers who are not dependant on the government for work or jobs for their employers have got together and question the perfect collapse of the towers.. and what about building 7 ?? the questions don't end.
Yet for an airplane, the pieces are still being investigated and are still in possession of the government.. strange double standard.
I think that if you believe 'the story' you like looking through wool like a sheep, has wool over it's eyes..