I was recently in C.City & they had a 1080 HD TV set-up with a split screen so that 1/2 of the screen was showing a Blue-ray recording while the other half was just a normal DVD. While you could see a difference, (if you really studied it for a minute) it was not that great & I don't think it justifies paying $400 for a Blue-ray player & 3X the price for the DVD's. What does everyone else think?
( A little background: I am a real techno buff & was one of the first suckers to buy the Pioneer Laser Disc player (for $700) back in the 1980's, so I know how easy it is to get burned........In actuality, the Laser Disc player was fine....it was the actual Discs that were about 50% defective, for about $25.00-$35.00 a disc....Alot of money back when gasoline prices were about $1.30/gallon)
