I'm On Fire wrote:'You won't let me appoint who I want? That's fine. I've got EO's I can use.'
Sunny Boy wrote:I'm On Fire wrote:'You won't let me appoint who I want? That's fine. I've got EO's I can use.'
And they may be due to rule on those soon too- just wait.
But, will he try to get away with any of it when even his SCOTUS appointees tell him he's breaking the laws ? It's rare this court ever has a unanimous decision.
Regardless if anyone likes this court, or not, this was a big slap-down.
Gekko wrote:"Ouch, ...... That's gonna leave a mark"
He will keep going while the sheeple go about their lives.
SCOTUS has no means of enforcement.
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.
In a popular quotation that is probably apocryphal, President Andrew Jackson reportedly responded: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!