Richard S. wrote:Oh we understand it perfectly.


stockingfull wrote:FOX, the network that shaded Barack to look blacker is FOX.
coalkirk wrote:stockingfull wrote:FOX, the network that shaded Barack to look blacker is FOX.
Those are two different shots in two different lighting settings. Nobody tried to make Obama look blacker. Your powers of observation are lacking.
stockingfull wrote:coalkirk wrote:stockingfull wrote:FOX, the network that shaded Barack to look blacker is FOX.
Those are two different shots in two different lighting settings. Nobody tried to make Obama look blacker. Your powers of observation are lacking.
Hmmm, "two different lighting settings." The darker one on FOX, the lighter one on CNBC.
You just said the same thing in a different way.
coalkirk wrote:stockingfull wrote:coalkirk wrote:Those are two different shots in two different lighting settings. Nobody tried to make Obama look blacker. Your powers of observation are lacking.
Hmmm, "two different lighting settings." The darker one on FOX, the lighter one on CNBC.
You just said the same thing in a different way.
He's wearing a different tie!!! You think maybe those are two different times and locations??? Fox doesn't control everything....yet.
coalkirk wrote:Sure I do but a magazine has alot more control over their cover shot than a news crew does covering a candidate on the trail making a speach. Your reaching your conclusion based on your prejudices and nothing else.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group