The Enemy

Marines Motorcycle Club Give Code Pink a Taste of Their Own Medicine:

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=13

That old commie, Ben Franklin, had it right when he wrote, in 1759, that "they that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Dark threats from outsiders are always the inducement for people to give up their privacy. And then the fun starts; just ask the Germans who lived through the 30's.

"Al Qaeda increasingly faces sharp criticism from once-loyal sympathizers"

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... full.story

Its about time.

the real enemy is the bush administation.

ken wrote:the real enemy is the bush administation.

ken wrote:the real enemy is the bush administation.

Worst , most dangerous enemy this country has ever faced!

Devil5052 wrote:

ken wrote:the real enemy is the bush administation.

Worst , most dangerous enemy this country has ever faced!

And yet our elected Democrat majority congress won't do anything about it ....Gosh!

BugsyR wrote:And yet our elected Democrat majority congress won't do anything about it ....Gosh!

You have that right!! They have no guts.

Devil5052 wrote:

BugsyR wrote:And yet our elected Democrat majority congress won't do anything about it ....Gosh!

You have that right!! They have no guts.

Republican Prez, Democrat majority in congress, disgruntled citizens that voted the clowns into office, etc etc etc

Almost time for a beer!

Devil5052 wrote:

ken wrote:the real enemy is the bush administation.

Worst , most dangerous enemy this country has ever faced!

Whether your a dem or rep don't you think its a little bit over the line to say the president is the worse enemy the country has ever faced? Seriously, whether you like Bush or not you have to give the man some respect. He didn't ask to be put in the situation of being the president when the twin towers were hit and he is the first president that has had to get down to business and deal with this threat. He's made mistakes certainly though bad advice, poor judgment or whatever the cause may be, but anything he has done wrong I truthfully think he did in good faith for the better of this country.

Amen to that.^

I'll double AMEN that!

Beware though...we have gone down this path in several other threads.

Richard S. wrote:

Devil5052 wrote:

ken wrote:the real enemy is the bush administation.

Worst , most dangerous enemy this country has ever faced!

Whether your a dem or rep don't you think its a little bit over the line to say the president is the worse enemy the country has ever faced? Seriously, whether you like Bush or not you have to give the man some respect. He didn't ask to be put in the situation of being the president when the twin towers were hit and he is the first president that has had to get down to business and deal with this threat. He's made mistakes certainly though bad advice, poor judgment or whatever the cause may be, but anything he has done wrong I truthfully think he did in good faith for the better of this country.

No Richard , I really don't think I went over any lines. Only time will tell, but I think GW Bush will go down as the worst President this country has ever had, & it will take decades to overcome the damage he has done to our economy, our military, our justice Department & our moral standing in the world. I never thought I'd live to see the day when a US President would basically renounce the Geneva Convention , parse words & make the use of torture an American interrogation technique. It's obviously just my opinion, but I don't think the man deserves anything but contempt!

You remember Johnson & Carter? Give me a break.

spc wrote:You remember Johnson & Carter? Give me a break.

How 'bout that.

All you who want "respect" accorded to Dubya should remember how you thought, spoke and/or wrote about Carter, Clinton and your other Democratic faves. Obviously, we don't go far enough back here to show you those words, but if a Democrat is elected this November, how do you intend to talk about President Obama, or President Hillary?

"Respectfully?"

The end of civility in D.C. can be traced directly back to Newt and the "Contract with America" class of '94. (A personal friend went in with Newt in that class.) After 40-odd years of Democratic control, Newt made no secret that he intended to "take over" the House and that he didn't particularly care about whether some of the old collegiality was lost in the process. The polarized partisan atmospherics started then and culminated with the budget shut-down and the impeachment. Then came the 2000 election, won by the Supreme Court, and the second chapter, authored by Rove, Cheney and Bush. You can believe me when I say there are a whole lot of Democrats who've wanted almost nothing more in the past year and a half than to impeach Bush and Cheney for everything from the war lies, to the torture, to the unconstitutional Patriot Act excesses and the endless string of "signing statements." But, to her great credit, Nancy Pelosi isn't having any of the tit-for-tat. And it's true stateswomanship on her part, because she knows that an endless volley of retributive impeachments will do nothing but paralyze and thereby essentially threaten our form of government. (As if the signing statements and the "unitary executive" themselves haven't.)