Are Rice Burning Stoves More Efficient Then Nut Stoves?

Post Reply
 
scp944
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue. Oct. 18, 2005 8:26 pm
Location: Mt.Pocono PA

Post by scp944 » Sun. Dec. 18, 2005 5:33 pm

Whats the difference between stoves that burn nut and stoves that burn rice sized coal? I seen a stove burning rice at a stove store and seemed to me that it was much more efficient. Unlike my stove that burns nut and must be full, this stove had a small burning pot with only a few hand fulls of rice burning, looked very similiar to my dads pellet stove. And the heat coming out of it was unbelievable.

steve

 
User avatar
Richard S.
Mayor
Posts: 15243
Joined: Fri. Oct. 01, 2004 8:35 pm
Location: NEPA
Stoker Coal Boiler: Van Wert VA1200
Coal Size/Type: Buckwheat/Anthracite

Post by Richard S. » Sun. Dec. 18, 2005 7:08 pm

I'm not so sure, it's smaller burn area but it's also burning very fast. I've heard both are more efficient from different sources but I would put my money on the stoker. It's a even constant heat, even to the point where it won't come on unless you need it. Rice coal will go out without a draft.


 
coalburner
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat. Jan. 07, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: Syracuse

Post by coalburner » Sat. Jan. 07, 2006 10:12 pm

My stove has a feed pot and can burn up to 8 lbs an hour but it runs most of the time at 2.5 lbs an hour.
It takes some cleaning to keep it working but I get a complete burn with little or no unburnt pieces.
It heats 1700 + sq ft to 70 degrees on all but the days it is singal digits.

Post Reply

Return to “Coal News & General Coal Discussions”