Return Piping
-
- Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Thu. Feb. 28, 2008 9:40 am
- Location: South Central, PA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1953 EFM520 Highboy
Setting up the EFM high boy..
Question on piping to the returns on the bottom rear of the boiler. The one on my boiler is plugged and quite probably has been since installed in 1953. Tried to unplug and it wouldn't Budge... Thus I am left to ask is it OK to continue and only use the one return side on this boiler? instead of teeing and going into both returns? Please let me know! Thanks.
Question on piping to the returns on the bottom rear of the boiler. The one on my boiler is plugged and quite probably has been since installed in 1953. Tried to unplug and it wouldn't Budge... Thus I am left to ask is it OK to continue and only use the one return side on this boiler? instead of teeing and going into both returns? Please let me know! Thanks.
I have a 1959 EFM. Both returns and the outlet were choked down to 3/4". They wouldn't budge either. I finally had to drill, cut and bust the three of them out. It was time consuming and basically a nasty job. I connected the returns as recommended by EFM. I figured if the designers recommended it be connected that way I better do it. Not sure why but I'm not taking any chances.
- Freddy
- Member
- Posts: 7292
- Joined: Fri. Apr. 11, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: Orrington, Maine
- Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 130 (pea)
- Coal Size/Type: Pea size, Superior, deep mined
I always believed the reason for two returns was simply to make it easier on the plumber. Use the one that's easy to get to and plug the other. As long as the one you're using is the proper size for the BTU's you'r using you should be all set.
- stoker-man
- Verified Business Rep.
- Posts: 2071
- Joined: Mon. Nov. 19, 2007 9:33 pm
- Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
- Hand Fed Coal Boiler: 1981 efm wcb-24 in use 365 days a year
- Coal Size/Type: Anthracite/Chestnut
- Other Heating: Hearthstone wood stove
Two returns even out the water temperature inside better than one return. Notice the use of valves and the balancing line to the feed side to prevent shocking the boiler and moderating the feed water.
-
- Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Thu. Feb. 28, 2008 9:40 am
- Location: South Central, PA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1953 EFM520 Highboy
OK so can anyone give me any ideas on how to get it out? at this point in time the ends have already broken off the square nut on there. We were using the correct size pipe wrench with a 4' extension breaker bar and it still wouldn't budge....
So is there anything I could try? Maybe heating it with a torch some? please help!
So is there anything I could try? Maybe heating it with a torch some? please help!
-
- Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Thu. Feb. 28, 2008 9:40 am
- Location: South Central, PA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1953 EFM520 Highboy
Stokerman
what do you mean by "notice the use of valves.... etc" where am I to be looking to see what you are trying to show me... is it in the manual? My boiler is the old style, round door, from 1953. let me know please!
what do you mean by "notice the use of valves.... etc" where am I to be looking to see what you are trying to show me... is it in the manual? My boiler is the old style, round door, from 1953. let me know please!
I was just in that same position last week. I also used an oxy/acetelene torch to try to heat them without any luck.
If there is still enough of the fitting sticking out above the vessel cut the top off with a sawzall. That should bare the sides of the fitting. Then I took a hacksaw and cut into the sides of the fitting making sure not to damage the threads on the vessel. I made cuts about every 1/2 inch about half way around the fitting. Then break the pieces out with a chisel and hammer. If you can't cut the top off the fitting drill 4 -5 holes into the top of the fitting and do the same thing with the hacksaw.
This is a real time consuming deal. I'm sure plumbers might have an easier way but that was the best I could come up with. I got 3 fittings out that way but I spent about 5 hours on each one. Be real careful not to damage the threads on the vessel. I wouldn't have any idea how to fix that.
If there is still enough of the fitting sticking out above the vessel cut the top off with a sawzall. That should bare the sides of the fitting. Then I took a hacksaw and cut into the sides of the fitting making sure not to damage the threads on the vessel. I made cuts about every 1/2 inch about half way around the fitting. Then break the pieces out with a chisel and hammer. If you can't cut the top off the fitting drill 4 -5 holes into the top of the fitting and do the same thing with the hacksaw.
This is a real time consuming deal. I'm sure plumbers might have an easier way but that was the best I could come up with. I got 3 fittings out that way but I spent about 5 hours on each one. Be real careful not to damage the threads on the vessel. I wouldn't have any idea how to fix that.
- Freddy
- Member
- Posts: 7292
- Joined: Fri. Apr. 11, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: Orrington, Maine
- Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 130 (pea)
- Coal Size/Type: Pea size, Superior, deep mined
You could weld a new end on it & try that, but I'll bet without drilling and sawing, it's not going to come out. Drill a one inch hole through it. Use a sawsall to cut it into 5 or 6 pie shaped pieces. Cut down to the threads, but don't go into the threads. Now you can use a drift pin and two pound ball pean hammer and break out the pieces.
But... I'd just run one return. While it's a nice idea to balance the flow for better heat distribution in the boiler, I'll bet in 99% of the cases, it's not truly balanced. Water takes the path of least resistance. Unless you put pressure gauges on both returns so you really know, you just don't know! Just my opinion, but it's not going to hurt a steel boiler to have a differential in temps from one side to the other or from the top to the bottom. A cast iron boiler might have regulations on temperature differential between top & bottom, but a steel boiler just isn't going to get hurt. I'd leave that one plugged, use the one that's working, and have no worries. If you're really worried you can add a by pass valve that makes some water spin in circles from supply to return. That'll keep the temps inside the boiler similar.
But... I'd just run one return. While it's a nice idea to balance the flow for better heat distribution in the boiler, I'll bet in 99% of the cases, it's not truly balanced. Water takes the path of least resistance. Unless you put pressure gauges on both returns so you really know, you just don't know! Just my opinion, but it's not going to hurt a steel boiler to have a differential in temps from one side to the other or from the top to the bottom. A cast iron boiler might have regulations on temperature differential between top & bottom, but a steel boiler just isn't going to get hurt. I'd leave that one plugged, use the one that's working, and have no worries. If you're really worried you can add a by pass valve that makes some water spin in circles from supply to return. That'll keep the temps inside the boiler similar.
- mozz
- Member
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Mon. Sep. 17, 2007 5:27 pm
- Location: Wayne county PA.
- Stoker Coal Boiler: Axeman Anderson 1982 AA-130 Steam
[quote=" at this point in time the ends have already broken off the square nut on there. We were using the correct size pipe wrench with a 4' extension breaker bar and it still wouldn't budge....
[/quote]
Same thing happened to me on my AA130 install, the plug was there for 26 years. I broke off the square ends trying to get it out, even heated with a propane torch to no avail. Hammer and chisel, it is cast, it will break off in small pieces, takes a bit of time but I got it out, without damaging the threads.
[/quote]
Same thing happened to me on my AA130 install, the plug was there for 26 years. I broke off the square ends trying to get it out, even heated with a propane torch to no avail. Hammer and chisel, it is cast, it will break off in small pieces, takes a bit of time but I got it out, without damaging the threads.
- Cap
- Member
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Fri. Dec. 02, 2005 10:36 pm
- Location: Lehigh Twp, PA
- Hand Fed Coal Stove: Harman SF 250, domestic hot water loop, heat accumulator
- Coal Size/Type: Nut and Stove
- Other Heating: Heat Pumps
Folks!
There are pipe wrenches and there are large union wrenches/adjustable wrenches.
Pipe wrenches are for round fittings. Square wrenches for square fittings. Pipe wrench puts an uneven pull on a square fitting. Usually not a problem when tightening a new clean fitting. But I always made a habit of using the proper tool. Use the proper tool when possible.
Mark, you will need to use a oxy/ace torch. Not much of a choice. You need to burn out the old rust, corrosion & pipe dope. If your plug is rounded, you have no choice but to use a pipe wrench. I wouldn't recommend using such a large cheater. Too much torque is not always smart and can get you in trouble.
There are pipe wrenches and there are large union wrenches/adjustable wrenches.
Pipe wrenches are for round fittings. Square wrenches for square fittings. Pipe wrench puts an uneven pull on a square fitting. Usually not a problem when tightening a new clean fitting. But I always made a habit of using the proper tool. Use the proper tool when possible.
Mark, you will need to use a oxy/ace torch. Not much of a choice. You need to burn out the old rust, corrosion & pipe dope. If your plug is rounded, you have no choice but to use a pipe wrench. I wouldn't recommend using such a large cheater. Too much torque is not always smart and can get you in trouble.
-
- Member
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Thu. Feb. 28, 2008 9:40 am
- Location: South Central, PA
- Stoker Coal Boiler: 1953 EFM520 Highboy
Thanks for all the tips guys... we'll see what happens..
I know Freddy is outnumbered here with the "leave it in" suggestion but I almost am inclined to go with that.
Water will go with the least resistance and although it would more than likely be SOMEWHAT more balanced I still don't know that its worth it. The boiler is a 1953 and someone out there had a nice warm house for 55 years without issue...
maybe i'll try the same.
I know Freddy is outnumbered here with the "leave it in" suggestion but I almost am inclined to go with that.
Water will go with the least resistance and although it would more than likely be SOMEWHAT more balanced I still don't know that its worth it. The boiler is a 1953 and someone out there had a nice warm house for 55 years without issue...
maybe i'll try the same.
- Sting
- Member
- Posts: 2983
- Joined: Mon. Feb. 25, 2008 4:24 pm
- Location: Lower Fox Valley = Wisconsin
- Other Heating: OBSO Lennox Pulse "Air Scorcher" burning NG
?????
What does you heat loss calculation say?
How many GPM do you need to circulate about these choke points?
If the flow doesn't need to be to the potential of the boiler - your fine. under fire the appliance - Could that be why it did its job in the past?
I know - my questions do not answer your question... but whats a figment of the public internet to do?
My clairvoyance and human interaction skills suck - so I ask.
What does you heat loss calculation say?
How many GPM do you need to circulate about these choke points?
If the flow doesn't need to be to the potential of the boiler - your fine. under fire the appliance - Could that be why it did its job in the past?
I know - my questions do not answer your question... but whats a figment of the public internet to do?
My clairvoyance and human interaction skills suck - so I ask.