Blatant LIES from Obama about Benghazi warrant many ?'s

I will continue this from here: Liberalism always achieves the exact opposite of its intent



Glenn was right - there was NO protest! It wasn't about the video!

MANY BIG questions on this mess (namely, whose side Obama is REALLY on):

Why isn't anyone asking Obama why he hadn't attended his security briefings in the days leading up to the murder of our Ambassador?

Why was Obama, on film OVER 10 DAYS after this murder, still telling the U.N. & anyone else that would listen that it was a stupid Youtube video??? (while at the same time Hillary was FINALLY calling what it was all along - a TERRORIST attack ... AND the Libyan president says the exact same thing!! ) http://current.com/community/93909458_h ... attack.htm - http://www.theblaze.com/stories/libyan- ... o-with-it/

Why was CNN at the embassy finding more facts than OUR STATE DEPARTMENT .. all while Obama was on "The View" saying there "is an FBI investigation" into this murder?

These are just a couple questions I can rattle off the top of my head. There are some SERIOUS problems here that need to be addressed!!!

EDIT: here are even MORE questions!

WHY was the plea for more security by those at the U.S Embassy IGNORED???? http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/ ... 9I20121002

This whole debacle just makes me sick.

Anybody with an IQ above a Zit knew the story was bogus, hell watching Susan Rice was just plain embarssing.

Those "bumps in the Road" were much more than that, the attack lasted 6hrs. these poor souls held out a damn long time.

Mortars were used, 4 were walked up to and hit their target, you can't do that unless you've previously set your marks...which flies in the face of the OBMAMA Lie that it was spontanious.

BAd news before a Presidential Election trumps the lives of 4 brave Americans who died horribly (judging by the bloody finger streaks all throughout the embassy wall) and President Hopey-Changey went to Vegas to Party.

SMITTY wrote:I will continue this from here: Liberalism always achieves the exact opposite of its intent



Glenn was right - there was NO protest! It wasn't about the video!

MANY BIG questions on this mess (namely, whose side Obama is REALLY on):

Why isn't anyone asking Obama why he hadn't attended his security briefings in the days leading up to the murder of our Ambassador?

Why was Obama, on film OVER 10 DAYS after this murder, still telling the U.N. & anyone else that would listen that it was a stupid Youtube video??? (while at the same time Hillary was FINALLY calling what it was all along - a TERRORIST attack ... AND the Libyan president says the exact same thing!! ) http://current.com/community/93909458_h ... attack.htm - http://www.theblaze.com/stories/libyan- ... o-with-it/

Why was CNN at the embassy finding more facts than OUR STATE DEPARTMENT .. all while Obama was on "The View" saying there "is an FBI investigation" into this murder?

These are just a couple questions I can rattle off the top of my head. There are some SERIOUS problems here that need to be addressed!!!

EDIT: here are even MORE questions!

WHY was the plea for more security by those at the U.S Embassy IGNORED???? http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/ ... 9I20121002

I hear you brother. I work for Uncle Sam......................they say "BIG BROTHER IS ALWAYS WATCHING". I wish I could say more than "No Comment".

The way I look at it is that if even I can easily figure out it was a planned attack they did as well. The question then becomes exactly who, if you just start off accusing every Omar, Mohammed & whatever Joe would be you have a bunch of groups PO & you also have a bunch of Americans there as well. If you care about the one's that are there you don't want to make things worse, it's a delicate situation & if you go off making false accusations you put other in harms way, sometimes it's a lot better to use brains than brawn.

sometimes it's a lot better to use brains than brawn.

Sorry Sam, I must have missed it. When did they ever use brains?

We had actionable intell prior, a Local Militia even volunteered info and help ( but was declined) . Yes there are Pro-US factions in Lybia, I saw the marches demostrating as such and Amb. Stevens was actually very well liked as a Pro-Lybian friend.

Requests for increased security "denied".

Requests to add addtional Concentina Wire Fencing along the the walls "Denied".

Access to the truth from this Administration....."DENIED"

BENGHAZIGATE!

The MSM only reports about Big Bird.

Susan Rice is in line for Secretary of State if you haven't heard enough.

Hillary is trying to hide from any responsibility for this.
The Bamster has fu**ed up foreign policy royally by creating a vacuum in Libya and now the radical muz is all up in there. He either thinks he can actually "normalize" the violent region; or he's wearing Taliban underwear himself.

Hillary wants to run in 2016, so let's see who she try to throw under the bus.

-------------------

I saw a show about the first 24 hrs after Pearl Harbor - FDR got caught with his pants down too. Churchill was begging him to get into WWII, there was a big anti-war movement called America First that wanted us to keep a laissez-faire policy, that dissolved when it was obvious we would all have to fight for our lives and our country. The two chief Navy muckety mucks at Pearl were fired, MacArthur was in the Phillipines saying, "our tails are inthe air", meaning he was ready for the Japs. Then they hit US bases there just like Pearl. MacArthur kept his job.
In 1941, The US had ONE DIVISION military strength, Hitler had 300 divisions, The Japs had 200. We tooled up and defeated fascism.

samhill wrote:The question then becomes exactly who, if you just start off accusing every Omar, Mohammed & whatever Joe would be you have a bunch of groups PO & you also have a bunch of Americans there as well. If you care about the one's that are there you don't want to make things worse, it's a delicate situation & if you go off making false accusations you put other in harms way, sometimes it's a lot better to use brains than brawn.

Neville Chamberlain, is that you? Sounds like you're an appeaser too. If they gave a rat's ass about Americans over there in the first place, there would have been adequate security. Yeah, your Bamster has a lot of brains apologizing to the entire world for the last 4 years and now he is gutting the military. Suicidal, unpatriotic liberals. The damn FBI couldn't even get in there to investigate. Who cares what towel head did it when we all know it was Al-Quada. Maobamarx told us they were done for just to get political gain stateside; when it's obvious he just aggravated the muslim world even more. Pitiful failure of a leader.

Yep Dann, it came out today that some of those making the most noise also voted to decrease funding for that very same protection, naturally they were hoping that wouldn't be mentioned. There were requests for more funding but denied & even cut by Congress. Just another example of a POTUS not being able to do the job of Congress & when it backfires then Congress blames the POTUS for them not doing it. Kind of a tangled web ain't it. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/1 ... f=politics
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep ... t&page=all I was always under the impression that special Marines guarded & provided security but it seems that too has changed.

Obama is responsible for rules of engagement. That's why that Seal helicopter got shot down too. That helicopter had an AC-130 gunship with it and it couldn't soften up the area where that helicopter was shot down.
Nice try trying to blame somebody else than the White House; that's what Rice, Obama, Carney, Clinton tried. Liars. Coverup.

Go ahead and post your left wing propaganda; and politicise this immense failure of the admin you support so blindy.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... anson?pg=1



http://www.veteransforastrongamerica.or ... ten-lives/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go ahead and try to blame republican congress for this, it's an undefendable position.

"A memo Tuesday by the Oversight Committee's Democratic staff provided details of Nordstrom's interview with the panel's investigators.

In that interview, Nordstrom said he sent two cables to State Department headquarters in March 2012 and July 2012 requesting additional diplomatic security agents for Benghazi, but he received no responses.

He stated that Charlene Lamb, the deputy assistant secretary for international programs, wanted to keep the number of U.S. security personnel in Benghazi artificially low. He said Lamb believed the Benghazi facilities did not need any diplomatic security special agents because there was a residential safe haven to fall back to in an emergency. "


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10 ... z28xI6nhxb

How many examples of the truth do you need to see:

http://freebeacon.com/benghazi-hearing- ... errorists/

Sam, linking the Huff Po to back up claims from the White House is like asking a Wall Street wiz how they feel about high gas prices, when their entire portfolio is Exxon-Mobil stocks -- you already KNOW how they're going to spin it before you read one sentence. They're SO in the bag for this president (like much of the mainstream media) that you couldn't sqeeze a factual statement out of them if you tried! Might as well just ask the White House how it went down - you'll get the same answer.

Somehow, some way, everything they do wrong is spun back to the Republicans being at fault. It's so blatant now they don't even TRY to hide it anymore.

More broken promises and lies,this president ran on accountability and transparency. Just like "fast and furious" the public will never find out the truth. I'd like to know who is going to fall on thier sword for this one? The day it happened I knew that this didn't happen over a video. If I knew how didn't the government? They blew it! End of story.

Ever wonder why things seem so cut & dry that anyone with half a brain would be able to figure it out ... yet the gov't defies logic & does the complete opposite of what they should? There's a reason why - Michelle Bachmann tried to ask some questions about it, and was ridiculed in the press, called an "extremist", a "racist", an "islamophobe", and a few other buzzwords the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD likes to use.

There's plenty of evidence to suggest Obama is answering to them before the American people. Once you know that fact, everything this admin does that defies logic suddenly makes sense to you.

He cheered the "arab spring", while others said ..."wait a minute ... lets look into this deeper". Nope! He endorsed and praised them full force as the best thing to happen to Egypt. What was the arab spring all about? Muslim Brotherhood taking over after the people kicked our ally out.

Couldn't wait to invade Libya to "free the people" ..... but Syria? Iran? Nope - turns a blind eye while their people are slaughtered. Doesn't say one word.

Fort Hood shooting -- Obama tells us "not to jump to conclusions" ... and then labels it a "workplace shooting" .... There's piles and piles of evidence this guy was ready for full blown jihad .. but no none of that matters ....

Trayvon Martin case -- he condemns the shooter before knowing any of the facts, then glamorizes the punk that was shot, nearly creating a race war.

All references to "radical Islam" have been purged from FBI/CIA training manuals, and new troops are being "educated" about Islam by the very radicals we're supposed to be fighting!

Certainly this country isn't being run by someone who cares much about it.

I heard the FBI wasn't onsite until about 2 weeks or so after the attack because the Libyan govt would not give permission for them to go. Can you imagine Reagan taking that for an answer?

If ya really want to go nuts here's a website I found.

"The True Motive

In order to facilitate designs for vivifying Islamic doomsday mythology, Al Qaeda has once again employed its long-standing "pre-election surprise" tactic in the coordinated attacks of September 2012 and the ensuing orchestrated mob violence in the three targeted countries. Continuing a trend that spans the entire post-9/11 age, Al Qaeda has chosen to reserve its major terrorist surges for the weeks before U.S. national elections."

http://binladensplan.com/September_2012_Attacks.html

I had previously heard that Bin Laden wanted to bait us into a huge bank-breaking war- already happened. Intrigueing website.