samhill wrote:Plumb. please show me where I ever said I want guns banished, I did however say that I personally see no need for weapons like the AR15 or large mags but that's just my personal opinion, I believe that I said something to the effect that it makes someone feel real good to shoot all those rounds so be it. I just don't get anything out of it nor can I afford it, the only point I'm trying to make is that there is more of an uproar over something that may inconvenience some than there was over the actual shooting.
My point is, why because someone doesn't personally see the need for something make it ok to ban it? So if I don't see the need for a lot of things we have should I say its ok for someone to take away someone else's right. Example. Just say I don't fly anymore. And people get killed in aircraft a lot and aircraft can and have been used as weapons of mass destruction on an enormous scale. Should I protest that they fly over my house? Should I say we should outlaw large airliners from flying into a city. Or should we be banning them all together. What is the argument that make large aircraft any different than black guns?