Diesel has more btu's per gallon. This is the reason it is higher cost.
Cap wrote:Diesel has been higher than gas for at least the last 7 yrs. Maybe longer? Correct? Did you just notice?
Diesel has more btu's per gallon. This is the reason it is higher cost.

Scottscoaled wrote:All I know is I finally was financially able to buy a new truck. NICE Duramax diesel crew cab. HD2500. Pretty sweet truck! Rolled coal like nobody's business. Crap, it got to be so expensive to put diesel in that it went down the road with a young friend of mine. $100 every other day. He calls every now and then to complain how he doesn't have money anymore. Wasn't getting better mileage. Back to the old chevy 2500 with a gas 5.7L. That's one extreme, on the other side, the VW TDI is getting close to 48 MPG. Sort of cool to put $20 in and drive all over the place for the week. What I noticed here in N.Y. is that the diesel used to have a "cetane rating" of 44. Then it went to 42, now its 40. I used to get way better mileage with the higher cetane. Yep, garbage fuel for increased cost.![]()
Scottscoaled wrote:All I know is I finally was financially able to buy a new truck. NICE Duramax diesel crew cab. HD2500. Pretty sweet truck! Rolled coal like nobody's business. Crap, it got to be so expensive to put diesel in that it went down the road with a young friend of mine. $100 every other day. He calls every now and then to complain how he doesn't have money anymore. Wasn't getting better mileage. Back to the old chevy 2500 with a gas 5.7L. That's one extreme, on the other side, the VW TDI is getting close to 48 MPG. Sort of cool to put $20 in and drive all over the place for the week. What I noticed here in N.Y. is that the diesel used to have a "cetane rating" of 44. Then it went to 42, now its 40. I used to get way better mileage with the higher cetane. Yep, garbage fuel for increased cost.![]()
lsayre wrote:A rule of thumb that I've heard is that all other things being as equal as they generally can be (given the inherent design engineering differences), a Diesel model will on average get 30-35% better fuel economy than its closest match gasoline model. There is still 10-15% to be saved on fuel cost, even if Diesel is 20% more costly.
Wanna Bee wrote:Should have kept the Dmax and bought a throw away commuter car. That's what I did.
I ended up with a Chevy Cruze ECO, stick shift for my boring drive to work. Getting 45mpg as a lifetime average for the past 53k miles. I drive the truck on the weekends and for utility purposes.
LDPosse wrote:
I hear you there. I have the 2500HD, a 1971 Buick Skylark with a 455, a Hayabusa and a DR650. I drive the truck when I need a truck, and the others when I want to have fun. No point wearing them out for the daily grind, getting them covered in salt during the winter, sucking down all that gas, and shipping my hard earned $$ to the middle east!![]()
In the past 365 days, I've driven a combined 24,304 miles. 20,770 in the Prius and 3,534 on the others. 790.93 gallons, for a fleet average of 31 MPG
Wanna Bee wrote:...I also put 14k miles on a ZX6R this year...
I've done 10k in a year on the 'busa, only put about 1k on each of the past 2 years tho.Flyer5 wrote: I have a Ram 2500 w Cummins diesel and a VW TDI . The dodge gets about 23 empty and 16 loaded with trailer. I rarely drive it if it is empty though. The VW I get 44 winter and 50-52 summer. It gets lousy when I stick a 1500lb trailer behind it, it drops to a measly 35.
NEPA Crossroads is a creation of Nepadigital.Com ©2009 • Contact Admin | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group